K
karlarae
Guest
What is the name of your state? wisconsin
we are currently in the process of an open adoption of a baby boy born april 4th, 2003. the birth mom was 14 yrs old at time of conception and birth. the birth father was 2 months away from turning 18. birth father has been nowhere in the picture during the entire pregnancy, birth or the past 2 months since the baby was born. we have a open adoption with the birth mom and her family, and a very good relationship. we went to court on may 22 to finalize the adoption with the birth mom and the birth father showed up to contest the adoption. the agency will work this week to try to get him to sign off once he knows what is involved financially - $500.00 paternity test, reimbursement of lawyer fees, foster care, medical bills, etc.
as of know though a court date has been set for july to hear his case and he has chose to have a jury trial make the decision instead of just a judge. if a jury decides he has rights and will not terminate them the birth mom will not terminate her rights as she doesn't want him raising the baby. she will be forced to parent a child she doesn't want to raise.
this young man has lots against him right now. he has been in the hospital for a drug overdose in the past, criminal history, still a senior in high school, lives with grandma, no job or car, and possibly has another girl pregnant. we are hoping that it doesn't make it to a trial and he just will agree to sign off his rights. however, my question is do we even have to worry about making it to court? what is the law about the ages involved here. if he comitted sexual assault can't they just terminate his rights? birth mom did consent to intercourse, but she had just turned 14 at the time and is considered a child? i've been doing research and found the following; 948.01 - "child" means a person who has not attained the age of 18 yrs old except for prosecuting a person who is alleged to have violated a state or federal criminal law, "child" does not include a person who has attainted the age of 17 yrs old.
also, 48.415 - parental concent of terimination of rights is not needed if sexual assault of incest has happened.
please help us. thank you, waiting mom.......
we are currently in the process of an open adoption of a baby boy born april 4th, 2003. the birth mom was 14 yrs old at time of conception and birth. the birth father was 2 months away from turning 18. birth father has been nowhere in the picture during the entire pregnancy, birth or the past 2 months since the baby was born. we have a open adoption with the birth mom and her family, and a very good relationship. we went to court on may 22 to finalize the adoption with the birth mom and the birth father showed up to contest the adoption. the agency will work this week to try to get him to sign off once he knows what is involved financially - $500.00 paternity test, reimbursement of lawyer fees, foster care, medical bills, etc.
as of know though a court date has been set for july to hear his case and he has chose to have a jury trial make the decision instead of just a judge. if a jury decides he has rights and will not terminate them the birth mom will not terminate her rights as she doesn't want him raising the baby. she will be forced to parent a child she doesn't want to raise.
this young man has lots against him right now. he has been in the hospital for a drug overdose in the past, criminal history, still a senior in high school, lives with grandma, no job or car, and possibly has another girl pregnant. we are hoping that it doesn't make it to a trial and he just will agree to sign off his rights. however, my question is do we even have to worry about making it to court? what is the law about the ages involved here. if he comitted sexual assault can't they just terminate his rights? birth mom did consent to intercourse, but she had just turned 14 at the time and is considered a child? i've been doing research and found the following; 948.01 - "child" means a person who has not attained the age of 18 yrs old except for prosecuting a person who is alleged to have violated a state or federal criminal law, "child" does not include a person who has attainted the age of 17 yrs old.
also, 48.415 - parental concent of terimination of rights is not needed if sexual assault of incest has happened.
please help us. thank you, waiting mom.......