Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > FAMILY LAW > Adoption

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 06-25-2009, 07:24 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sitting at the computer probably rolling my eyes at your post
Posts: 9,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogmatique View Post
I can see both sides of this one though - the biological parent has the right to privacy, but I'm not sure that trumps an adopted child's desire (and occasionally need) to be forewarned (commonly to decide whether they wish to risk passing on the gene or decide not to have biological children for fear of passing it down).
No one's DESIRE trumps someone's FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. Ever. This is America. I can't think of one time when someone NEEDS to have medical history. It's nice to have. Makes the doctor's job easier, but never once has someone not been able to be treated because they don't have medical history.

And so what do you do with people who like I said, were never adopted and for whatever reason have no access to their family medical history? Should they never have children just because? Puhhhleeze.
__________________
Someone else sees it too:
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandyclaus View Post
CourtClerk is right.

Last edited by CourtClerk; 06-25-2009 at 07:26 PM.
  #32  
Old 06-25-2009, 07:44 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Weigh a pie...
Posts: 6,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by CourtClerk View Post
No one's DESIRE trumps someone's FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. Ever. This is America. I can't think of one time when someone NEEDS to have medical history. It's nice to have. Makes the doctor's job easier, but never once has someone not been able to be treated because they don't have medical history.

And so what do you do with people who like I said, were never adopted and for whatever reason have no access to their family medical history? Should they never have children just because? Puhhhleeze.
Aw c'mon, that's not what I said

It did provoke a question though...

If the semen provider is aware of their own genetic downfall and goes ahead with donating semen (or impregnating someone) without disclosure, would that make the donor liable for anything? Would that be similar to the cases where an Aids-infected person has knowingly infected someone else and is consequently charged with a criminal offense?

(Sorry for the hijack...though it is somewhat related. Sort of. Kinda)
__________________
*****************************


When you can't bear something but it goes on anyway, the person who survives isn't you anymore; you've changed and become someone else, a new person, the one who did bear it after all.
— Austin Grossman

Quote:
Salagadoola mechicka boola bibbidi-bobbidi-boo
  #33  
Old 06-25-2009, 10:01 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 29,675
These days, many inherited conditions can be tested for.

If this man wanted to know his kid, he'd be easily contacted. He apparently doesn't. Move on.
__________________
Children aren't coloring books. You don't get to fill them in with your favorite colors.
The Kite Runner, Khaled Hosseini



*********
R.I.P. Penny.
8/12/97 - 11/12/09
She was a good hound,
and a good friend.
She will be missed.

*********

Last edited by stealth2; 06-25-2009 at 10:06 PM.
  #34  
Old 06-26-2009, 02:11 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 637
Dog: If I have a marker for say, CF, and know it, and has sex with someone else who has a marker for CF, and we make a baby, it's not a crime that I'm aware of.
__________________
I actually LIKE being referred to as snarky, so please, bring it on.
  #35  
Old 06-26-2009, 02:20 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,155
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErynSMA View Post
Dog: If I have a marker for say, CF, and know it, and has sex with someone else who has a marker for CF, and we make a baby, it's not a crime that I'm aware of.
Agreed.

Implying that only fit and healthy people should reproduce is rather scary. Makes me think of a certain Final Solution that included doing away with ill, frail, mentally ill, developmentally disabled, retarded persons etc.
__________________
Adoptive parents ARE "real" parents. Sharing genes is not what makes you a "parent"!

Last edited by nextwife; 06-26-2009 at 02:24 PM.
  #36  
Old 06-26-2009, 02:48 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Weigh a pie...
Posts: 6,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErynSMA View Post
Dog: If I have a marker for say, CF, and know it, and has sex with someone else who has a marker for CF, and we make a baby, it's not a crime that I'm aware of.
The premise did remind me about the Nushawn Williams case (if I remember correctly, NY man was prosecuted for concealing his known HIV diagnosis - he admitted it in court but retracted it and said he didn't actually know, later on).

I'm having weird Gattaca flashbacks too
__________________
*****************************


When you can't bear something but it goes on anyway, the person who survives isn't you anymore; you've changed and become someone else, a new person, the one who did bear it after all.
— Austin Grossman

Quote:
Salagadoola mechicka boola bibbidi-bobbidi-boo
  #37  
Old 06-26-2009, 03:01 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 31,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by nextwife View Post
Agreed.

Implying that only fit and healthy people should reproduce is rather scary. Makes me think of a certain Final Solution that included doing away with ill, frail, mentally ill, developmentally disabled, retarded persons etc.
Google Eugenics. Already been tried. Vermont did a gangbuster job of it so much so that Hitler copied it.

History: those who don't know it are doomed to repeat it.
__________________
Parents should remember three things: Love your kids more than you hate your ex (or soon to be ex) & when you have children the relationship with the other parent is until death parts you & how you treat your children determines what type of nursing home you end up in.


Nothing stated by me should be taken as giving you legal advice or forming an attorney/client relationship. The devil is in the details after all.

Licensed to practice law in Ohio and a Guardian Ad Litem for children
  #38  
Old 06-26-2009, 03:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohiogal View Post
Google Eugenics. Already been tried. Vermont did a gangbuster job of it so much so that Hitler copied it.

History: those who don't know it are doomed to repeat it.
An EXCELLENT application of Godwin's Law
__________________
*
*
The information I gave is based on my 7 seconds of research on Google. Review the information yourself to make an informed decision.

Communication is KEY - 10 mins of talking now can save you months of headaches later!

Masterfully stating the obvious to the oblivious! (Thanks SP!)

Tell it like it is! When all else fails, make up a statistic!

Gender references shall apply equally to the other gender. I will not correct gender mistakes (unless I want to)
  #39  
Old 06-26-2009, 03:13 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,781
Just to put a ribbon on this....

The moment your step father adopted you, your biological father became a legal stranger.

This means that you have no more right to his medical history than a person walking down the street past you has to yours. In the eyes of the law, you two are no more attached than you and I.

I think the above poster was referring to instances of organ and/or bone marrow transplant where a biologically close personage may be a more exact match than going to the database.

Even in those cases, however, nothing will force the biological parent to submit to the test and/or donate tissue.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdslilangel View Post
Just leave it as is and stop making yourselves sound real stupid about the sisutation at hand. Further more I don't need to know how to spell corcetly on here. I know how to spell perfectly fine. I did graduate high school and never once had any problems with my grammer.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.