It reads to me as this child and Mom moved to CT. Therefore, they would go by CT. law
No, you are completely wrong. It doesn't matter if the mother and child live in oregon, California, Bombay, India or the moon. Jurisdiction does not follow the family but the court order. As I said, if there is a valid court order in PA, THAT is the law that must be followed unless the steps to change jurisdiction to CT. are followed.
I shared my own experience period, regarding the possibility of an adoption happening here in CT. (legally), nothing more. I actually wanted to help..perhaps this site isn't about helping.
This site is about helping, not giving false information. Your post, while well-intentioned, has nothing to do with the LEGAL questions being asked. And false or wrong information most times does little to help. Instead, it wastes valuable time for the poster who needs to act now in securing the information I told them to get.
I have to ask, as a new member, is everyone so critical of a person trying to help?
I have have to answer Yes, when the information that person is trying to help with has no basis in law. And you got off easy LJLaw. There are others here who could have read you the riot act for posting false and misleading information.
Remember, If the poster obtains the information I told them to get and they discover that jurisdiction in fact still resides in PA, they have less than two months to act. And even if your guess is right and jurisdiction has been moved to CT, where would you propose they look? The only option for them is to contact the agency in PA which cancelled the Support order and find out why. If, in fact, it is because jurisdiction has been moved to CT, they will have the information on the specific court to contact.
I thought I was finding a site to get legal info, or opinion. I see I was wrong.
No, you were right. But the information you gave was not legally sound. So, we should all allow you to give that type of information and sooth your ego? And what about people who give you misleading or completely false information? Should we also let them get away with it? I don't think even you would want that.
Are there any real attiorney's here to actually answer questions? If so, I asked one yesterday and would really love an answer. Then I'm out of here as I see nothing to learn..If no answer comes by today then I'll just chalk this up as a waste of time, a joke of a site with a lot of bored people.
I'll tell you why I never answered your question and probably why no one else will. Immediately after posting your question you began giving legal advice to almost every thread. If you are that knowledgable about law then why would you need an answer? That's why I didn't waste my time. I can't answer for others.
To Haiku;
I agree. The support case has nothing to do with TPR. However, if the support case has been cancelled, there is a reason. It's imperative that the poster find this out because that's the key to resolving their questions. Just for clarification.