Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > FAMILY LAW > Alimony & Spousal Support

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-20-2005, 03:08 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1
Exclamation

Employee wants to "defer" income before hearing


What is the name of your state? New York

I have an employee that came to me asking if he could get seperate checks for regular pay and overtime. I know he is in the middle of a support hearing, and I asked him if this was to try and not show his O.T. income to the judge. He said it was, and I told him it would not work because his Y.T.D. accumulators would still show the income.

Fact of the matter is I don't want to "help" him out in this matter because of the simple fact I feel what he wants to do is wrong. The accumulator just popped into my mind and I figured that would be the end of the discussion.

Today however he asked if he could have his overtime pay "defered" until his case is settled. In other words, he would still work the O.T. but wants us to pay it to him at a later time. I told him probably not, but I would have to check the legalities.

My question for this forum is, as I would imagine this "hiding" of income is illegal (or immoral at best), is there any law / case / info that I could cite to him, either labor law related or flat out criminal, that could stop him from pestering me over this matter once and for all.

Thanks!
  #2  
Old 09-20-2005, 03:27 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Broom closet
Posts: 2,377
I am not sure. However, I recommend that you post this in the Child Support Forum. Stealth, I would think, should have some info for you as she is an NY resident and has business knowledge.
__________________
"Don't worry. It only seems kinky the first time."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Instead of being born again, why not just grow up?"
  #3  
Old 09-20-2005, 04:50 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 29,675
I really don't know. But if you're the boss, I'd simply tell him that it's against company policy. Period. End of story.
__________________
Children aren't coloring books. You don't get to fill them in with your favorite colors.
The Kite Runner, Khaled Hosseini



*********
R.I.P. Penny.
8/12/97 - 11/12/09
She was a good hound,
and a good friend.
She will be missed.

*********
  #4  
Old 09-20-2005, 09:49 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 41,453
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abner101
What is the name of your state? New York

I have an employee that came to me asking if he could get seperate checks for regular pay and overtime. I know he is in the middle of a support hearing, and I asked him if this was to try and not show his O.T. income to the judge. He said it was, and I told him it would not work because his Y.T.D. accumulators would still show the income.

Fact of the matter is I don't want to "help" him out in this matter because of the simple fact I feel what he wants to do is wrong. The accumulator just popped into my mind and I figured that would be the end of the discussion.

Today however he asked if he could have his overtime pay "defered" until his case is settled. In other words, he would still work the O.T. but wants us to pay it to him at a later time. I told him probably not, but I would have to check the legalities.

My question for this forum is, as I would imagine this "hiding" of income is illegal (or immoral at best), is there any law / case / info that I could cite to him, either labor law related or flat out criminal, that could stop him from pestering me over this matter once and for all.

Thanks!
As an accountant, and someone who has been an employer, I would not recommend agreeing to "help" out this employee. If you do that, you are putting yourself at risk in quite a few different ways. Not only from a legal standpoint but from a tax standpoint as well. If you put this question to either your company attorney or your company accountant, they would BOTH tell you not to help this employee in any way.

Simply tell him that you have researched the matter and that it would put your company at risk to play games with his income.....therefore you can't help him. Be firm.
  #5  
Old 09-21-2005, 01:17 PM
jackedbyjudge
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abner101
What is the name of your state? New York

I have an employee that came to me asking if he could get seperate checks for regular pay and overtime. I know he is in the middle of a support hearing, and I asked him if this was to try and not show his O.T. income to the judge. He said it was, and I told him it would not work because his Y.T.D. accumulators would still show the income.

Fact of the matter is I don't want to "help" him out in this matter because of the simple fact I feel what he wants to do is wrong. The accumulator just popped into my mind and I figured that would be the end of the discussion.

Today however he asked if he could have his overtime pay "defered" until his case is settled. In other words, he would still work the O.T. but wants us to pay it to him at a later time. I told him probably not, but I would have to check the legalities.

My question for this forum is, as I would imagine this "hiding" of income is illegal (or immoral at best), is there any law / case / info that I could cite to him, either labor law related or flat out criminal, that could stop him from pestering me over this matter once and for all.

Thanks!

[url]http://www.dol.gov/elaws/esa/flsa/screen5.asp[/url]
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:43 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.