Carl Switzer said:
MY RESPONSE: Tell me then. If the owner didn't report it, then who else would have "legal standing" to complain?
The state.
If in the course of another investigation or by some other means they come across evidence of the burglary, then they can go ahead and charge him with the burglary.
The insurance idea forwarded previously is also a possibility.
Dad may have done it. Maybe he didn't. But there is no requirement that he did. We prosecute suspects without cooperative witnesses and victims all the time.
But, no one will know for sure until such time as it goes to trial ... if it does.
MY RESPONSE: What's the difference who broke the window; the owner or the son? If the owner didn't wish to prefer charges, then where's the crime?
The crime requires certain elements to be complete. These elements rarely (if ever) include a statement that the victim must agree to charges.
The victim here would certainly be free to testify that he gave his son permission to break into his car and steal from him thus removing one of the elements of the offense.
- Carl