 | 
08-27-2003, 07:04 PM
| | | | Can police search a house if adult is not present?
What is the name of your state? MO
14 yr old was only one at house, only visiting does not live at house.
Police came and searched without a warrant, they found evidence linking to a robbery. Can they use it and was the search legal? |
08-27-2003, 09:03 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Mexifornia
Posts: 1,314
| | | Re: Can police search a house if adult is not present?
Quote: Originally posted by youngwoman
What is the name of your state? MO
14 yr old was only one at house, only visiting does not live at house.
Police came and searched without a warrant, they found evidence linking to a robbery. Can they use it and was the search legal? |
Looks like they had the right house. Say hello to Bubba!
__________________
****************************
IMPORTANT: READ CAREFULLY - Son of Slam comments are provided solely to reform, chastise, or replace existing opinions. Inasmuch, SOS holds no title to said SOS comments IF SOS comments are used only for non-profitable thought enhancement. Any other use of SOS comments are strictly forbidden without the expressed written permission of SOS. In so obtaining said permission you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions set forth in binding contract. If you do not agree to these terms and conditions, you may not copy, repeat, modify, think, or in any way use SOS comments. Once contracted, unless you acquired the SOS comments on external media, you may make a single copy of the SOS comments solely for archival purposes or rethinking of the SOS comments in the same context that the SOS comments were previously expressed. SOS retains all right, title, and interest in and to the SOS comments. All rights not granted are reserved by SOS. THE LIMITED WARRANTY (IF ANY) INCLUDED IN THE APPLICABLE SOS COMMENTS APPLIES TO THE SOS COMMENTS PROVIDED THE SOS COMMENTS HAVE BEEN LICENSED BY YOU WITHIN THE TERM OF THE LIMITED WARRANTY OF THE APPLICABLE SOS COMMENTS IF APPLICABLE.
|
08-28-2003, 11:00 AM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,075
| | | If the 14 year old had permission to be at the house, he could allow the search of the house without any other consent. |
08-30-2003, 02:51 PM
| | |
why would the police be there in the first place?
secondif you didn't have any thing to hide whats your problem? |
08-30-2003, 10:53 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Mexifornia
Posts: 1,314
| | Quote: Originally posted by exicutioner007
why would the police be there in the first place?
secondif you didn't have any thing to hide whats your problem? |
they found evidence linking to a robbery. |
08-30-2003, 11:00 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jan 2000 Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 38,191
| | Quote: Originally posted by exicutioner007
why would the police be there in the first place?
secondif you didn't have any thing to hide whats your problem? |
My response:
Hey "exicutioner 007" - - don't you just love how people spell a word phonetically, and STILL manage to spell it incorrectly?
IAAL |
08-31-2003, 11:36 PM
| | | | IAAL, I hear that's a common trait with cleptoemaineyacks. |
09-01-2003, 01:02 PM
| | | Quote: Originally posted by I AM ALWAYS LIABLE
My response:
Hey "exicutioner 007" - - don't you just love how people spell a word phonetically, and STILL manage to spell it incorrectly?
IAAL | Hey "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE" the reason it was spelled that way was because the correct spelling was already in use when I registered for my email address.
This thread was about searching without a warrant not waisting time trying to critique others grammatical errors. Try getting back to the topic. |
09-01-2003, 01:07 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jan 2000 Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 38,191
| | Quote: Originally posted by exicutioner007
Hey "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE" the reason it was spelled that way was because the correct spelling was already in use when I registered for my email address.
This thread was about searching without a warrant not waisting time trying to critique others grammatical errors. Try getting back to the topic. |
My response:
"Waisting" time? How to you put a belt around time? Perhaps that word was also "in use".
I wasn't critiquing your "grammatical errors." I was critiquing your "spelling error."
IAAL |
09-01-2003, 01:16 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Mexifornia
Posts: 1,314
| | Quote: Originally posted by exicutioner007
Hey "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE" the reason it was spelled that way was because the correct spelling was already in use |
IF executioner007 was taken, why didn't you use executionerOO7? |
09-01-2003, 10:39 PM
| | | | Because exicutioner007 worked just as well. My lord, it is just an internet nickname and part of my email address. | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread |  Linear Mode | | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | | |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 PM.
