• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Confidential Informant's name is written on a document in evidence

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

j-lucy

Junior Member
What is the name of your state?What is the name of your state? California

This case involves a confidential informant who's name is hand-written on a document that was siezed by police during a search warrant execution and is now a part of the evidence.

Question: At the preliminary hearing, when the defense asks of the affiant, "Do you know this person?" (in reference to the name on the document in evidence), how does the people's privilege come into play here? Claiming the privilege would indirectly expose the informant's identity, thus subverting the intent behind the privilege. In addition, any further questioning, even in the case that the affiant were to answer "yes" in reference to knowing the person behind the name, but without declaring him/her as the informant, could very well lead to information that might be deemed as privileged.
 


BelizeBreeze

Senior Member
j-lucy said:
What is the name of your state?What is the name of your state? California

This case involves a confidential informant who's name is hand-written on a document that was siezed by police during a search warrant execution and is now a part of the evidence.

Question: At the preliminary hearing, when the defense asks of the affiant, "Do you know this person?" (in reference to the name on the document in evidence), how does the people's privilege come into play here? Claiming the privilege would indirectly expose the informant's identity, thus subverting the intent behind the privilege. In addition, any further questioning, even in the case that the affiant were to answer "yes" in reference to knowing the person behind the name, but without declaring him/her as the informant, could very well lead to information that might be deemed as privileged.
Why do you expect us to do your homework for you?
 
shocked

Belize: I'm shocked that you would presume that a poster with obviously limited knowledge about law would take advantage of this site.

jlucy- the answers are yes, no, and maybe.
 
Last edited:

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top