Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Arrests, Searches, Warrants & Procedure : Includes Right to Counsel, Fifth Amendment Rights, Right to Trial by Jury, etc.
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE > Arrests, Searches, Warrants & Procedure

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-24-2008, 01:57 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6

A few questions about searches.


What is the name of your state? Virginia.

Its a really long story, but at the end of the day a house was raided. The search warrant specified that they were searching for "All firearms and ammunition" In the house. The entire house is searched, All guns, ammunition, cases, and various related things are taken. The homeowners were told to stay in a room and were not allowed to see what they were doing or what they ended up taking. A room was found with a small quantity of marijuana and paraphernalia. The occupant of the room was arrested for possession of marijuana.

Basically, I want to know if that is completely legal. I can give more details, but I dont know if im not allowed to give details, but the situation was ALOT more twisted than what I wrote out.
  #2  
Old 01-24-2008, 02:00 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,229
If they have a warrant for firearms and ammunition, then they can look where ever they might reasonably expect to find such. If the drugs/paraphernalia are in a place that might conceivably hold the guns/ammunition, then it's discovery is legal and you can be charged.

There's no obligation for them to allow you observe. Eventually you should get an inventory of what was siezed.

Absent the "twisted" details or some specific question that's about the best we can do.
  #3  
Old 01-24-2008, 02:09 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6
Well I dont know if it will make any differance, but all of the weapons in the home are legally registered and were all in plain view, we would have simply told the cops this had they asked. The reason for the raid of the house? 3 Shots fired while test firing a weapon. The officer who led the raid came to our house the day of the incident. Take into mind that 2 police officers in the last few months have came to the house while we shot and told us that it was perfectly legal. However the third cop had it out for us and said "I cant prove your doing anything wrong today, but I will eventually. If it was up to me I would just take you into the woods and settle this like men". The next time we see that officer? With 5 or 6 other officers pointing guns at a woman holding a 2 month old baby, then proceeding to push the door into her.


I just think its odd that they thought a full blown raid was neccisary. Nobody ever came to the house to retreive the firearm that was invloved or to make us aware of the warrant out for a reliatives arrest. We had nothing to hide, It was perfectly legal what we did, we had permission from the only occupied dwelling within 100 yards, except it was not know because it was our roomate who got it. The cops never asked the actual people living in the house if they gave us permission.
  #4  
Old 01-24-2008, 02:57 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,309
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gsr2k6 View Post
Well I dont know if it will make any differance, but all of the weapons in the home are legally registered and were all in plain view, we would have simply told the cops this had they asked.
Um, the whole point of the warrant/raid was an attempt to discover any firearms you might not have had in plain view. That's why they call it a "search" warrant. I, and the officers, have no doubt you'd be more than willing to show them all legally registered weapons.
__________________
Due to popular demand, I have edited my signature:

I may have "Senior Member" status, but that's because I know more than you!
  #5  
Old 01-24-2008, 03:44 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6
Do you really think a raid like this was needed though? The search warrant said "Firearms and ammunition related to the incident on **/**/**" The rifle was in plain sight, we told them where the others were, they told us to "Shut up or be put in handcuffs". Today we called and they told us they had to take all the firearms in the house to test to see which was fired. Which would be impossible because they are all shot reguarly and at this house none the less. Like i said, this is not the first time a cop has come out to talk to us about it. Because stupid neighbors dont get the picture. In the last few months we have had 2 officers come out, word for word one said "If I lived out here I would be shooting my guns too, Have a nice day." The other one said it was all perfectly legal, and suggested maybe we put up a backdrop and offered to help set one up AND COME SHOOTING.

I just dont understand why all of this happened over such a simple matter. Its one cop who didnt like us.


By the way, the rifle was a AK-47. A legally registered gun with a bad reputation. Had it been a .22 the cop would have simply left. He told us this.
  #6  
Old 01-24-2008, 04:05 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,653
The execution of the warrant sounds perfectly valid. It doesn't matter if WE think it was "needed".

Get off the dope.

I know you don't want to hear that answer...
__________________
*
*
The information I gave is based on my 7 seconds of research on Google. Review the information yourself to make an informed decision.

Communication is KEY - 10 mins of talking now can save you months of headaches later!

Masterfully stating the obvious to the oblivious! (Thanks SP!)

Tell it like it is! When all else fails, make up a statistic!

Gender references shall apply equally to the other gender. I will not correct gender mistakes (unless I want to)
  #7  
Old 01-24-2008, 04:36 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6
FYI it actually wasn't me who got charged with possession, Buddy. Well I can see the police have more support than I here, its true. Ignorance of the law is no excuse, aparrently even when multiple cops tell you its fine.
  #8  
Old 01-24-2008, 04:57 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Vertiform City
Posts: 5,128
Policemen are not lawyers (only a few) prosecutors or judges.

Never EVER take legal advice from a police officer who has been called to your door.

VA law suggests (well more than suggests) that is it not may well not be legal to discharge a firearm inside a residence for the purpose of test firing.

I don't know what else to tell you. The search was legal and the fruit of that search (the weed and the pos. arrest) were also legal.

Don't shot guns in residential areas and don't keep weed in a place with weapons.

The police did a big favor by not arresting all the house residents, as they well could have.
__________________
I've often thought of becoming a golf club.
  #9  
Old 01-24-2008, 07:16 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by xylene View Post
Policemen are not lawyers (only a few) prosecutors or judges.

Never EVER take legal advice from a police officer who has been called to your door.
One assumes that police officer sent to there door over something would know the law about the matter. Its kind of there job you know, to come out and sort the matter which we thought they did. If a cop tells me its okay to do something, then another says the same, and more in the past, I would belive it to be sorted out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xylene View Post
VA law suggests (well more than suggests) that is it not may well not be legal to discharge a firearm inside a residence for the purpose of test firing.
The gun was fired outside.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xylene View Post
I don't know what else to tell you. The search was legal and the fruit of that search (the weed and the pos. arrest) were also legal.
Eh read the other comments, Im not so much trying to defend anyone that was here, there lawyers will do a fine job.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xylene View Post
Don't shot guns in residential areas and don't keep weed in a place with weapons.
Weed wasn't with a weapon, it was in a room that had a shotgun behind the door which they were informed was there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xylene View Post
The police did a big favor by not arresting all the house residents, as they well could have.
They had no right to arrest anyone but the one the warrant was issued for. I dont know how the possession charge will go, but its not a big deal for him anyways. NORML has his back so its a non issue. The homeowner had no firearms in there room or anything else, So saying that they could have arrested everybody in the house is unreasonable.
  #10  
Old 01-25-2008, 09:30 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,229
Quote:
The gun was fired outside.
Still illegal on lots smaller than a couple of acres in many counties.
Quote:
Weed wasn't with a weapon, it was in a room that had a shotgun behind the door which they were informed was there.
Sounds like it was close enough.
Quote:
They had no right to arrest anyone but the one the warrant was issued for.
Not true.
  #11  
Old 01-25-2008, 12:12 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6
So your basically saying they could have arrested somebody in the house who had nothing illegal, commited no crime, and had no guns in there possesion? Sounds fair.
  #12  
Old 01-25-2008, 01:35 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,229
I didn't say that. They arrested someone who they had probable cause to have committed a crime: possession of drugs. Just because the cops come by with a search warrant for guns doesn't mean they have to turn a blind eye to other criminal activity going on.
  #13  
Old 01-25-2008, 01:43 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,653
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gsr2k6 View Post
FYI it actually wasn't me who got charged with possession
So, you weren't charged with possession, yet you don't deny what I said.

Again, get off the dope.
__________________
*
*
The information I gave is based on my 7 seconds of research on Google. Review the information yourself to make an informed decision.

Communication is KEY - 10 mins of talking now can save you months of headaches later!

Masterfully stating the obvious to the oblivious! (Thanks SP!)

Tell it like it is! When all else fails, make up a statistic!

Gender references shall apply equally to the other gender. I will not correct gender mistakes (unless I want to)
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.