Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Arrests, Searches, Warrants & Procedure : Includes Right to Counsel, Fifth Amendment Rights, Right to Trial by Jury, etc.
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE > Arrests, Searches, Warrants & Procedure

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-27-2008, 02:00 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 20

How can I get Bond back, if not charged of any crime?


What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Ar.

,''HOW CAN police CHARGE ME of a num. of crimes, Spent 3 nights in jail till I got a lawyer for $3,000. and he got my bail cut in more than half to $50,000, MAKING ME BAIL OUT, SPENDING $5,000 .
Then LATER I get a letter from prosecuting Att. Office, TELL ME , 'THERE IS NO CRIMANAL CHARGES Filed in this case and the things that was seized from my home could be picked up."
what ABOUT MY MONEY? I asked bond man and police to pay me back, said ,"NO".
What can I do?
Reason for not being charged ,as they said,. I was told ,"" they had lot better cases to spend there time on". It's clear my right were broken, I posted the story on here, look for RRATM
There ARE FEW LAWYERS IN Ar. THAT WILL WORK THIS TYPE CASE and I don't have ?? $5,000 or >?? to file suit not knowing if I will get my money back.
  #2  
Old 12-27-2008, 02:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: California
Posts: 18,448
Send a message via AIM to CdwJava Send a message via Yahoo to CdwJava
The burden of proof to support an arrest is the "probable cause" to believe that a crime has been committed and that the person arrested has committed the crime. This is a relatively low burden to meet.

Unless you can get a court to rule that the arrest was made WITHOUT probable cause, then the arrest stands and you are out your fee to the bail bondsman. A DA deciding NOT to prosecute does not mean the arrest was unlawful. The DA has other considerations and has to meet a higher burden at trial should he or she choose to take it that far.

Sorry, but unless you can go to court and have the arrest ruled unlawful, it's likely you are out that money.

- Carl
__________________
A Nor Cal Cop Sergeant

"Make mine a double mocha ...
And a croissant!"

He Who Kneels Before God
Can Stand Before Anyone

....author unknown
  #3  
Old 12-27-2008, 02:58 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Victorville, Ca.
Posts: 663
The bond was nothing more than an insurance policy that you purchased. It was to ensure that you appeared in Court.

Your best move would be as noted above.
__________________
The mouth speaks what the mind thinks.
You will get no "warm-fuzzy" from me.

Every person in America today that doesn't have a criminal defense Attorney on retainer at all times is a fool.
  #4  
Old 01-05-2009, 07:01 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldandTired View Post
The bond was nothing more than an insurance policy that you purchased. It was to ensure that you appeared in Court.

Your best move would be as noted above.
I understand that, but I never got a court date, never had to go to court,and all the charges the polices told me I was charged with, I got a letter in the mail from prosecuting att. , saying ," there will be no criminal charges filed in the case"!! I don't get why Bond man dont have to get the money back, there was no risk of me not showing up?


Does anyone think I could get my money back by filing with the DOJ?
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division
(DOJ) that address police misconduct and explains how you can file a complaint with DOJ if you believe that your rights have been violated.
  #5  
Old 01-05-2009, 07:35 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,229
Because that is how the Bond Man (who is a private enterprise) makes his money. He puts up his own collateral to cover the $50,000. It's an extremely risky short term loan.

The Department of Justice doesn't have your money. They can't give you any.

You can sue the offending agency if there was specific and gross impropriety. You haven't indicated any.

As pointed out, the standard for arrest is less than the standard for guilt in court.
  #6  
Old 01-05-2009, 10:28 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Posts: 562
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRATM View Post
I don't get why Bond man dont have to get the money back, there was no risk of me not showing up?
Incorrect. Just because you don't get in a car wreck doesn't mean you get your premiums back!
__________________
"Fair" is a place where pigs win ribbons, and nothing else.
  #7  
Old 01-05-2009, 11:01 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,503
I have some more good news. If the bond was already exonerated and the DA decides he does want to prosecute you for these crimes, you will be re-arrested, taken back to jail and required to post a new bond for your release!

Yes, another 5K down the drain.

You should see if you can have an attorney make a request with the court for your existing bond to remain in place for at least a year, so you do not end up having to pay out another 5K, for the same charges, which you will not get back for a second time.
__________________
If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not turn and bite you for your kindness, but he will stand by your side until death.
This is the principal difference between a dog and a man.
  #8  
Old 01-07-2009, 12:53 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 20

On 12-30-08 under RRATM I posted the hole story


Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingRon View Post
Because that is how the Bond Man (who is a private enterprise) makes his money. He puts up his own collateral to cover the $50,000. It's an extremely risky short term loan.

The Department of Justice doesn't have your money. They can't give you any.

You can sue the offending agency if there was specific and gross impropriety. You haven't indicated any.

As pointed out, the standard for arrest is less than the standard for guilt in court.
The Dep. of Justice said in there complaint form, they give relief to some victims or police misconduct.

It takes so much money to file suit on police and sucks B.C. they know they broke my rights and thats why prosecutor would file the charges, the police said I was arrested on.
  #9  
Old 01-07-2009, 12:56 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: California
Posts: 18,448
Send a message via AIM to CdwJava Send a message via Yahoo to CdwJava
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRATM View Post
The Dep. of Justice said in there complaint form, they give relief to some victims or police misconduct.

It takes so much money to file suit on police and sucks B.C. they know they broke my rights and thats why prosecutor would file the charges, the police said I was arrested on.
The legal requirement to support an arrest is "probable cause" to believe that the person arrested had committed a criminal offense. This burden is much less than the burden a DA must meet at trial which is "beyond a reasonable doubt". Unless you can show that the officers lacked probable cause to make the arrest, you are probably out of luck.

- Carl
__________________
A Nor Cal Cop Sergeant

"Make mine a double mocha ...
And a croissant!"

He Who Kneels Before God
Can Stand Before Anyone

....author unknown
  #10  
Old 01-07-2009, 01:06 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by outonbail View Post
I have some more good news. If the bond was already exonerated and the DA decides he does want to prosecute you for these crimes, you will be re-arrested, taken back to jail and required to post a new bond for your release!

Yes, another 5K down the drain.

You should see if you can have an attorney make a request with the court for your existing bond to remain in place for at least a year, so you do not end up having to pay out another 5K, for the same charges, which you will not get back for a second time.
B.C. of threats , I couldn't get the affidavit from the police , So I held off one yr. This happened about a yr. and 3 months ago.
I never had court at all to even ask anyone any thing. I tried to ask bondman, they said no , wouldn't give me money back and I even had a letter from prosecution att. off stating there will be no criminal charges files in this case. ??ButI pay $5,000 to bond mad for two months, have letter and get nothing back?
  #11  
Old 01-07-2009, 01:26 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRATM View Post
B.C. of threats , I couldn't get the affidavit from the police , So I held off one yr. This happened about a yr. and 3 months ago.
I never had court at all to even ask anyone any thing. I tried to ask bondman, they said no , wouldn't give me money back and I even had a letter from prosecution att. off stating there will be no criminal charges files in this case. ??ButI pay $5,000 to bond mad for two months, have letter and get nothing back?
You got to not sit in jail for two months. If you had posted the $50,000 in cash you would have received the money back when you either showed up for your hearing or the case was dropped. You paid a bondsman 10% of the bond he posted on your behalf. You do not get the money back just because the DA decided not to prosecute you. Your rights have not been violated and the criminal justice system in your city/state seems to be par for course.
  #12  
Old 01-07-2009, 01:57 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by CdwJava View Post
The legal requirement to support an arrest is "probable cause" to believe that the person arrested had committed a criminal offense. This burden is much less than the burden a DA must meet at trial which is "beyond a reasonable doubt". Unless you can show that the officers lacked probable cause to make the arrest, you are probably out of luck.

- Carl
I posted the hole story on here under , arrests, warr. and procedures on 12-30-08 , name RRATM.
That just the thing, I know my rights were broken but I dont have any more money to spend, I'm out $8,000.00 right now and sure it would be $2,500 to $ 5,000 to file suit.
This is just wrong, I wasn't charged of any crime , never went to court one time, just got letter in mail stating there will be criminal charges files in this case. and they charges me with 4 class Y's and 3 class C crimes.
I'm sorry, they just dont drop charges like this in less they really messed up.
thanks for help.
  #13  
Old 01-07-2009, 02:05 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: California
Posts: 18,448
Send a message via AIM to CdwJava Send a message via Yahoo to CdwJava
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRATM View Post
I'm sorry, they just dont drop charges like this in less they really messed up.
thanks for help.
Actually, they do. DA's have to meet a much higher burden of proof and if that burden is not met, they drop it. It may very well be that the DA decided that the gun might be an issue and that the "search" that led to the issuing of a search warrant was questionable. Maybe they decided to drop for some other reason.

I have no idea whether there existed probable cause to make the arrest under state law. The original arrest for harassment seems to be a no-brainer as they had a warrant. If you were also charged and had to bail out based upon someone peering through a back window AFTER you were taken in to custody, that might be a problem. But, the arrest for the warrant, that's easily good.

If you truly have a case for false arrest, etc., then you should have attorneys lining up at your door to offer services on contingency when you tell them your story.

- Carl
__________________
A Nor Cal Cop Sergeant

"Make mine a double mocha ...
And a croissant!"

He Who Kneels Before God
Can Stand Before Anyone

....author unknown
  #14  
Old 01-10-2009, 05:32 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 20

They had wrong address on warant


Quote:
Originally Posted by CdwJava View Post
Actually, they do. DA's have to meet a much higher burden of proof and if that burden is not met, they drop it. It may very well be that the DA decided that the gun might be an issue and that the "search" that led to the issuing of a search warrant was questionable. Maybe they decided to drop for some other reason.

I have no idea whether there existed probable cause to make the arrest under state law. The original arrest for harassment seems to be a no-brainer as they had a warrant. If you were also charged and had to bail out based upon someone peering through a back window AFTER you were taken in to custody, that might be a problem. But, the arrest for the warrant, that's easily good.

If you truly have a case for false arrest, etc., then you should have attorneys lining up at your door to offer services on contingency when you tell them your story.

- Carl

iI

I JUST FOUND OUT THEY HAD WRONG ADDRESS ON WARRANT, NOW WHRER DO I STAND?
I STAYED IN JAIL 3 NIGHT, OUT $8000 , MISSED WORK, IS IT TO LATE FOR ME TO DO ANYTHING? ITS BEEN A YR, AND 4 MONTH?
  #15  
Old 01-10-2009, 05:37 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: California
Posts: 18,448
Send a message via AIM to CdwJava Send a message via Yahoo to CdwJava
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRATM View Post


iI

I JUST FOUND OUT THEY HAD WRONG ADDRESS ON WARRANT, NOW WHRER DO I STAND?
I STAYED IN JAIL 3 NIGHT, OUT $8000 , MISSED WORK, IS IT TO LATE FOR ME TO DO ANYTHING? ITS BEEN A YR, AND 4 MONTH?
Okay ... but was the warrant still for YOUR arrest?

The address of a search warrant is a bigger problem than the address on an arrest warrant. Since you apparently stepped outside, they could make the arrest. I have made a number of arrests even with the wrong address. Since people we want tend NOT to be at the place listed on their warrant, this is usually a non-issue.

If the address was the key, then everyone arrested would give a phony address so as to have such a grand technicality one day.

I am unsure of the time frame you might have in you state to take any action if any action is possible. It may be too late at this point. You would have to consult legal counsel.

- Carl
__________________
A Nor Cal Cop Sergeant

"Make mine a double mocha ...
And a croissant!"

He Who Kneels Before God
Can Stand Before Anyone

....author unknown
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.