Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Arrests, Searches, Warrants & Procedure : Includes Right to Counsel, Fifth Amendment Rights, Right to Trial by Jury, etc.
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE > Arrests, Searches, Warrants & Procedure

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-28-2005, 10:53 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1

Illegal Search and Seizure in Texas


Texas

I was wondering if anyone could inform me what the "Satute of Limitations" is regarding filing a suit against city/county for "illegal search and seizure" in Texas?

I am fairly positive i was subjected to one last october. I live in a texas county which is overly zeolous in its procecutions and police and sheriff matters. Although i was submitted with a search warrent signed by a JP which was broad and abitrary.

No investigation came about i was never interviewed or questioned and all my personal possessions where returned 3 months later...end of story. I feel no probable cause exsists or exsited and search was a result of an unstable irrational ex-girlfriend who fabricated a police/sheriffs report.

Any prompt response would be greatly appreciated as I am in the process of finding representation.

thank you
  #2  
Old 09-28-2005, 12:46 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,351
Find your representation and ask him your questions.

You will find that you have no case aganst the authorities because they had probable cause based on the xGF.

You can ask that charges for filing a false report be filed against the xGF, but the DA may decline to file charges unless you can absolutely prove that she knew her allegations were false.
  #3  
Old 09-28-2005, 01:42 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 118
You need to look at this from the perspective of the authorities. They were relying on information from your Ex-G/F when they did this stuff. How were they to know that she is nuts or that her statements were unreliable?

Bottom line is that, from what you posted, it doesn't look like you've got a case at all against the city/county.
  #4  
Old 09-28-2005, 02:03 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: "Harvey and Me"
Posts: 25,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceizgod
Texas

I was wondering if anyone could inform me what the "Satute of Limitations" is regarding filing a suit against city/county for "illegal search and seizure" in Texas?

I am fairly positive i was subjected to one last october. I live in a texas county which is overly zeolous in its procecutions and police and sheriff matters. Although i was submitted with a search warrent signed by a JP which was broad and abitrary.

No investigation came about i was never interviewed or questioned and all my personal possessions where returned 3 months later...end of story. I feel no probable cause exsists or exsited and search was a result of an unstable irrational ex-girlfriend who fabricated a police/sheriffs report.

Any prompt response would be greatly appreciated as I am in the process of finding representation.

thank you
A peace officer is under no duty of care in the exercise of its discretionary power to enforce the law. If an injury results from an act or omission of a governmental employee exercising governmental discretion, neither the state nor the employee is liable.

A person cannot sue the fire department for failing to put out a fire in his or her house, or the police department for failing to stop the theft of his or her car. Only if a plaintiff can show that the government owed him or her a special duty beyond that owed to the public at large, will he or she prevail in a tort suit against the government.

Further, Texas law caps the amount of damages a person can recover from the government. Punitive damages only are recoverable in limited instances.

In your situation, although the statute of limitations for such a 'tort claim' is 2 years in Texas, no such injury...from an act of omission or...discretion occured. In fact, based on your post, it seems the ONLY fact you may have had at the time (if the warrant was in fact broad and arbitrary) was to quash the warrant itself, but, since no action of the kind was taken during the events, that avenue is now closed.
__________________
Just because I'm a miserable human being doesn't mean I'm not right...
  #5  
Old 09-28-2005, 02:08 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 118
"Only if a plaintiff can show that the government owed him or her a special duty beyond that owed to the public at large, will he or she prevail in a tort suit against the government."

And even then, maybe not. See Castle Rock V. Gonzales (2005).
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.