• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Legal to be handcuffed to fixed object in Delaware?

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

jessi3boys

Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? delaware

Is it proper police procedure to handcuff a person being detained to a fixed object in the state of Delaware?
 
Last edited:


You Are Guilty

Senior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? delaware

Is it legal to handcuff a person being detained to a fixed object in the state of Delaware?
Depends. If by "fixed object" you mean a neutered dog, then no. However, if you mean something that is not moving, then I have to question your intelligence.
 

jessi3boys

Junior Member
Depends. If by "fixed object" you mean a neutered dog, then no. However, if you mean something that is not moving, then I have to question your intelligence.
Question my intelligence? For your info I am a retired Md officer and it is against police procedure to handcuff anyone to a fixed object (ie rail, pole) for obvious safety reasons and liability reasons. I am not familiar with Delaware's policies and was merely asking as a close friend was arrested there and was handcuffed to a ring set in the wall for over three hours.
 

Zigner

Senior Member, Non-Attorney
Question my intelligence? For your info I am a retired Md officer and it is against police procedure to handcuff anyone to a fixed object (ie rail, pole) for obvious safety reasons and liability reasons. I am not familiar with Delaware's policies and was merely asking as a close friend was arrested there and was handcuffed to a ring set in the wall for over three hours.
Against procedure is not the same as illegal...
 

jessi3boys

Junior Member
Against procedure is not the same as illegal...
I also understand that. It is merely a question and no one seems to be able to answer it with a yes or no. All anyone seems to be able to do here is be insulting. I thought this website was here to help with questions not throw insults at the people who ask them. Apparently, I misjudged the calibre of the members here. I merely asked a question here because I could not find anything about Delaware's arrest and detention procedures online. MAybe I need to rephrase the question to: Is it against police procedure to handcuff a detainee/arrestee to a fixed object in the state of Delaware?
 

quincy

Senior Member
The answer to your question, jessi, is that it depends.

The DOJ's National Criminal Justice Reference Service advises that an officer should never handcuff a suspect to a fixed object or to himself. However it is not illegal to do so.

The test as to whether a suspect's Fourth Amendment rights are violated by the handcuffing was outlined in Michigan v Summers, 452 US (1981). In addition, the Fourth Amendment, which gives a person the right to be free from "unreasonable seizure," had reasonableness defined in Graham v Connor, 490 US (1989).

Handcuffing is warranted when there is a risk of flight, when it is used to minimize the risk of harm to officers, and when done to facilitate the orderly completion of a search. The authority to detain incident to a search is unquestionned. It is the prolonged use beyond the time reasonably required under the circumstances that is a question.

Whether three hours handcuffed to a fixed object is unreasonable and a violation of your friend's Fourth Amendment rights depends on all of the facts.
 
Last edited:

jessi3boys

Junior Member
The answer to your question, jessi, is that it depends.

The DOJ's National Criminal Justice Reference Service advises that an officer should never handcuff a suspect to a fixed object or to himself. However it is not illegal to do so.

The test as to whether a suspect's Fourth Amendment rights are violated by the handcuffing was outlined in Michigan v Summers, 452 US (1981). In addition, the Fourth Amendment, which gives a person the right to be free from "unreasonable seizure," had reasonableness defined in Graham v Connor, 490 US (1989).

Handcuffing is warranted when there is a risk of flight, when it is used to minimize the risk of harm to officers, and when done to facilitate the orderly completion of a search. The authority to detain incident to a search is unquestionned. It is the prolonged use beyond the time reasonably required under the circumstances that is a question.

Whether three hours handcuffed to a fixed object is unreasonable and a violation of your friend's Fourth Amendment rights depends on all of the facts.
Thank You very much Quincy.
 

quincy

Senior Member
You're welcome, jessi.



As an aside: I think it is probably better to be handcuffed to a fixed object than to one that is moving (say, a bus). ;)
 

CdwJava

Senior Member
When in a station for booking, an interview, or some form of processing it is not uncommon for a prisoner to be handcuffed or shackled to a fixed object. The person should not generally be unattended, but it is not un-common.

I would not think that three hours would be unreasonable if that is the time it took to do the processing or arrange for transportation of the prisoner to a holding facility. My old department had a bench with a rail running along the back side of it, and prisoners could be cuffed to the rail. We're looking to put something like that IN to my current agency because as it is right now, if we want a secure place to process prisoners, we have to take them to the jail ... not the best place to conduct interviews.

Different rules may also apply to juveniles. At least in my state, you generally cannot cuff a juvenile to a fixed object.

- Carl
 

You Are Guilty

Senior Member
Again, a violation of police procedure is not illegal. (If it was illegal, then someone is going to make millions off of Central Booking.)
 

jessi3boys

Junior Member
Again, a violation of police procedure is not illegal. (If it was illegal, then someone is going to make millions off of Central Booking.)[/QUOTE

She isnt looking to sue I was merely asking the question because I found it to be a bit "off" to be handcuffed to a ring set in the wall for 3 hours for an arrestable traffic violation (not DWI/DUI).
Oh and I already know that life isnt fair dear and no one ever told me it was. It was reinforced when I held my 27 year old brothers hand as he passed from cancer and again when illness struck me and ended my career in law enforcement at 30. Its how you handle the rough times that make you who you are.
 

jessi3boys

Junior Member
You're welcome, jessi.



As an aside: I think it is probably better to be handcuffed to a fixed object than to one that is moving (say, a bus). ;)
LOL isnt that the truth althought there were a few I would have loved to have done that too.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top