Is a Muslim's right to do violent jihad protected under the first right in the US con

[Malbim]

What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? IL

Mr. Cohen on March 24, 2016 at 1:57 am
*** QUOTES FROM THE KORAN ABOUT INFIDELS ***

Koran, chapter 4, paragraph 95:
Not equal are those believers who sit at home and receive no injurious hurt, and those who strive hard fighting jihad in Allah’s cause with their wealth and lives. Allah has granted a higher rank to those who strive hard fighting jihad with their wealth and bodies, above those who sit [at home].
Unto each Allah has promised good, but He prefers the jihadists who strive hard and fight above those who sit home. He has distinguished His fighters with a huge reward.

Koran, chapter 8, paragraph 12:
Your Lord inspired the angels with the message:
I will terrorize the unbelievers. Therefore smite them on their necks and every joint and incapacitate them. Strike off their heads and cut off each of their fingers and toes.

Koran, chapter 8, paragraph 39:
So fight them until there is no more fitnah [disbelief of non-Muslims] and all [people in the world] submit to the religion of Allah alone.

Koran, chapter 8, paragraph 59:
The infidels should not think that they can get away from us. Prepare against them whatever weapons you can muster, so that you may terrorize them. They are your enemy and Allah’s enemy.

Koran, chapter 8, paragraph 65:
O Prophet, urge the faithful to fight. If there are 20 among you with determination they will vanquish 200. If there are 100 then they will slaughter 1,000 unbelievers, because the infidels are a people devoid of understanding.

Koran, chapter 9, paragraph 5:
Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war.

Koran, chapter 9, paragraph 14:
Fight them and Allah will punish them by your hands, lay them low, and cover them with shame. He will help you over them.

Koran, chapter 9, paragraph 29:
Fight those who do not believe until they all surrender, paying the protective tax [jizya] in submission.

Koran, chapter 9, paragraph 123 :
Fight the unbelievers around you, and let them find harshness in you.

Koran, chapter 47, paragraph 4:
When you clash with the unbelieving infidels in battle, smite their necks until you overpower them, killing and wounding many of them. At length, when you have thoroughly subdued them, bind them firmly, making [them] captives. Thereafter either generosity or ransom (whichever benefits Islam) until the war lays down its burdens. Thus you are commanded by Allah to continue carrying out Jihad against the unbelieving infidels until they submit to Islam.

**********************************
FAMOUS LAST WORDS
**********************************

Mohammed’s last words before he died:
“O Lord, kill the Jews and Christians.”
SOURCE: Hadith Malik, 511:1588

EXPLANATION: Islam teaches that Mohammed’s
later teachings take priority over his older teachings.
Therefore, the later the teaching, the greater it is.
Therefore, Muslims must believe that Mohammed’s
last words were his most important words.
Hadith is a major Islamic holy book, like the Koran. Also in the Quran it says more then 90 times that Muhammad was the perfect example of a Muslim and that every Muslim should follow his example in everything they do

So based on what I wrote above, is a Muslim's right to do violent jihad guarantee under the first amendment of the US constitution

 

[tranquility]

But doesn't the US first amendment give u the right to practice ur religion as u see fit

While the Constitution says Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a religion, later statutes and Supreme Court decisions have changed it to freedom from religion in governmental affairs along with some level of right to not have the government restrict practice of sincerely held religious beliefs. As with all Constitutional rights, the determining factor is if the law is Constitutional, even if it purportedly violates a right is if it furthers a compelling government interest and is narrowly tailored to fulfill that interest.

If the government passes a law to punish those who practice violent jihad, it certainly seems compelling and closely tailored to the government interest so would probably be legal.

If the government passes a law to put those who talk of the right to do violent jihad into the stupid house, there may be more of a problem. Even though most would agree that is exactly where they should be.