okamsrazor said:
A. Agreed. HOWEVER, the polcie union does influnce politicians. One of their ways to get more money for police raises and benefits is to have more traffic laws in place such as lower speed limits etc.
Tell ya' what?? Prove your statement!! Provide ANY link to any published source to prove that it is the intent of police officers to enact more traffic laws so that the city can profit.
Come on... you should be able to back up what you say.
"They are doing their job, they are told to go write tickets."
*** No they are not. They are told to ENFORCE the laws. And if in so doing, they catch you BREAKING the laws, then they will ticket you. It is YOUR choice on whether to get a ticket or not.
"Thanks I already did. I did a "ride along" for 4 months during college. 40hrs a week actually."
*** Yea, right!!! You expect us to believe that your claim of four months as a 'rent-a-cop' at college was real experience. How about riding in a one man unit in the dark of night, in some of the baddest parts of town..... for several years!! Then, and only then, can you claim you have 'experience'. But I didn't ask for you to ride around the college campus in a golf cart!!
"They had a quota of 8 tickets every 12 hr shift, one of which was to be a DUI if the shift was after 10 pm."
*** And if you believe that, you are a bigger idiot than your posts imply. Granted, it is EXPECTED that an officer on the street should see LOTS of violations..... and yes, I think that a ticket every 90 minutes is NOT an unreasonable EXPECTATION by the department. If an officer didn't have at least one ticket every 90 minutes, I would think that he found himself a 'hidey-hole'.
"In fact I was told their rasies were dependant on how many tickets they could write and get to stick. That .00001% of the time they did anything besides traffic enforcement was petty drug related items."
*** In fact, you were told wrong!! There are LOTS of things that go toward determining and officers advancement in the department. And unlike private sector, an officer doesn't just get 'raises'.... and certanly NOT based on ticket production.
"Are you REALLY telling me JETX that you can not understand that traffic tickets is a big buisness? If it wasn't would we have speed traps? Would we have small town cars patrolling highways to generate additional revenue?"
*** Depends on where you are. In my state, a town cannot receive more than a certain percentage of their general revenue from traffic enforcement. Anything over that percentage goes to the states general fund.
And don't misunderstand, traffic enforcement IS a big revenue generator.... but only because there are violations to be written. Don't violate the law... don't get a ticket. Seems pretty simple to me.
Are you really saying that an officer should not issue a traffic citation when he sees a violation?? Or maybe you are saying that they should let every violator driving a red car have a 'free pass'. Or maybe, only 20-something blondes with big boobs should not be cited for their violations. You have to draw the line SOMEWHERE.... and the best place to draw it is at the violator. Simply.... break the law, get a ticket or arrest. Don't break the law, don't get a ticket or arrest. Again, seems might simple to me..... and not any part of a grand 'ticket citation conspiracy'.