Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Arrests, Searches, Warrants & Procedure : Includes Right to Counsel, Fifth Amendment Rights, Right to Trial by Jury, etc.
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE > Arrests, Searches, Warrants & Procedure

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-29-2006, 05:00 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3
Question

Shoplifting Detention - Notifying Parent


State - California

My question is, if a minor child is detained for suspicion of shoplifting, does the law state the detaining party must notify the parent during detention? Or is there any time frame within which the parent must be notified? Can the child be questioned without Miranda Rights being read? Thank you.

Kismet
  #2  
Old 01-29-2006, 05:28 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: California
Posts: 18,460
Send a message via AIM to CdwJava Send a message via Yahoo to CdwJava
Quote:
Originally Posted by kismet
My question is, if a minor child is detained for suspicion of shoplifting, does the law state the detaining party must notify the parent during detention?
No.

They generally do make the contact, however, as they could find themselves in hot water if the detention is longer than reasonable. What most stores do is try to contact the parent. If no parent can be reached, or they think the kid should be arrested rather than warned off to parents with a trespass notice and a threat of a civil assessment, they will call the police.


Quote:
Or is there any time frame within which the parent must be notified? Can the child be questioned without Miranda Rights being read? Thank you.
There is no specific time frame in the law. And they can be interviewed by the store staff without Miranda. When the police arrive, and the suspect is in custody, he or she should be Mirandized prior to being interviewed. In virtually all cases like this the officer SHOULD Mirandize the child before asking any questions whether or not the child is "in custody" since the "force" used int he detention (being held ina back office and not free to go) is likely to be seen as the equivalent of a custodial arrest.

But, the final determination would be by a judge and would be very fact-specific. I Mirandize on these and so do my officers. That does not mean that every does or that they have to in all such situations.

- Carl
__________________
A Nor Cal Cop Sergeant

"Make mine a double mocha ...
And a croissant!"

He Who Kneels Before God
Can Stand Before Anyone

....author unknown
  #3  
Old 01-29-2006, 05:43 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by CdwJava
No.

They generally do make the contact, however, as they could find themselves in hot water if the detention is longer than reasonable. What most stores do is try to contact the parent. If no parent can be reached, or they think the kid should be arrested rather than warned off to parents with a trespass notice and a threat of a civil assessment, they will call the police.



There is no specific time frame in the law. And they can be interviewed by the store staff without Miranda. When the police arrive, and the suspect is in custody, he or she should be Mirandized prior to being interviewed. In virtually all cases like this the officer SHOULD Mirandize the child before asking any questions whether or not the child is "in custody" since the "force" used int he detention (being held ina back office and not free to go) is likely to be seen as the equivalent of a custodial arrest.

But, the final determination would be by a judge and would be very fact-specific. I Mirandize on these and so do my officers. That does not mean that every does or that they have to in all such situations.

- Carl
Thank you Carl. I'm still a little at a loss here (and a bit upset) as this happened with my 14 year old daughter yesterday... I only found out today from her telling me. The store did call an officer (police) to come in, who did question her and her friend (no miranda) prior to the friend's parent arriving. They released the kids to friend's parent, who called me today and told me about this incident and that I would be notified by mail of what action (if any?) will be taken. No attempt was made by the store personnel or officer to call me, even though daughter gave them our phone number. I really feel a call should have been made to me.
  #4  
Old 01-29-2006, 06:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: California
Posts: 18,460
Send a message via AIM to CdwJava Send a message via Yahoo to CdwJava
Quote:
Originally Posted by kismet
Thank you Carl. I'm still a little at a loss here (and a bit upset) as this happened with my 14 year old daughter yesterday... I only found out today from her telling me. The store did call an officer (police) to come in, who did question her and her friend (no miranda) prior to the friend's parent arriving. They released the kids to friend's parent, who called me today and told me about this incident and that I would be notified by mail of what action (if any?) will be taken. No attempt was made by the store personnel or officer to call me, even though daughter gave them our phone number. I really feel a call should have been made to me.
Apparently there were no charges pressed. Had they been taken in to custody an attempt to notify you should be the standard procedure. If they were cited and released, then you may not have been immediately notified either.

You can always call the law enforcement agency and find out what happened. But, they are under no legal obligation to notify you if they are being released at the scene. It is a good idea, but not necessarily required.

Be thankful if there are no criminal charges pressed. Chances are that your daughter and her friend either got a stern warning or face a civil assessment penalty - which you might get in the form of a letter in the next few weeks for a couple hundred dollars or more. Unless the length of the detention was entirely unreasonable, there is nothing apparently done wrong here. It would not be uncommon for a detention of this nature to take an hour to an hour and a half.

You can call and ask questions of both the store and the police department. Maybe a policy was not adhered to. But, there would appear to be no law broken from what you wrote.

- Carl
__________________
A Nor Cal Cop Sergeant

"Make mine a double mocha ...
And a croissant!"

He Who Kneels Before God
Can Stand Before Anyone

....author unknown
  #5  
Old 01-29-2006, 07:00 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3
Thanks again Carl. That pretty much answers my question. I suppose since they spoke with the other parent, they may have felt that was all that was needed to do. I just would have preferred to get the information first hand rather than second hand. So now I'll just wait and see what notification I am sent. The other parent said something about us having to go to court. This is a first offense, she's never been in trouble with the law before. I don't have the store name (it was actually a kiosk in a mall), nor do I know which police department handled it. I could call other parent and ask, but as it seems all was handled as it should have been (no law/policy broken) then the best thing for me now is to focus on discussion with daughter to make sure she understands how unacceptable this was and how she will have to pay the consequences of her action. Thankfully she acknowledges she did something wrong. Glad she see's that! Thanks again.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:12 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.