Should Secure Contiuous Remote Alcohol Monitors be admissable in court?

[marcellus91872]

What is the name of your state?Michigan
In light of recent research for http://convictedinnocent.blogspot.com I have found that their has only been 1 published research on SCRAM and it was paid for by the proprietors AMS.The system has produced false positives and one MI. court already has it under re-evaluation.Shouldn't the test be performed by an independant 3rd party and isn't their supposed to be more than one before it is used (especially as direct evidence)?Looking for answers!

 

[Son of Slam]

What is the name of your state?Michigan
In light of recent research for http://convictedinnocent.blogspot.com I have found that their has only been 1 published research on SCRAM and it was paid for by the proprietors AMS.The system has produced false positives and one MI. court already has it under re-evaluation.Shouldn't the test be performed by an independant 3rd party and isn't their supposed to be more than one before it is used (especially as direct evidence)?Looking for answers!

SCRAM is soon to be replaced by SCUMBAG. See my post in this thread. https://forum.freeadvice.com/showthread.php?t=270174


*

 

[marcellus91872]

scumbag

already made my comment at the post SOS!