Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Arrests, Searches, Warrants & Procedure : Includes Right to Counsel, Fifth Amendment Rights, Right to Trial by Jury, etc.
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE > Arrests, Searches, Warrants & Procedure

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-26-2006, 07:52 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28

Tape recordings


I'm currently involved in a case against my ex-boyfriend who is charged with domestic violence. He has a long history of threatening me and I was wondering if I could record his threats or important information he plans to lie about with or without him knowing and use it as evidence in court? I live in Illinois. Thanks for any information.
  #2  
Old 01-26-2006, 08:07 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,503
Quote:
Originally Posted by levathian860
I'm currently involved in a case against my ex-boyfriend who is charged with domestic violence. He has a long history of threatening me and I was wondering if I could record his threats or important information he plans to lie about with or without him knowing and use it as evidence in court? I live in Illinois. Thanks for any information.
How would you know he is about to lie about important information? Sounds like your trying to entrap him into saying something?
  #3  
Old 01-26-2006, 09:09 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 31,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by outonbail
How would you know he is about to lie about important information? Sounds like your trying to entrap him into saying something?
The thing is entrapment is only if a state official convinces someone to do something that they normally wouldn't do. So technically she couldn't entrap him unless she was a state official.
  #4  
Old 01-26-2006, 10:30 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,503
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohiogal
The thing is entrapment is only if a state official convinces someone to do something that they normally wouldn't do. So technically she couldn't entrap him unless she was a state official.
From Merriam Webster

entrap

Pronunciation: in-'trap, en-
Function: transitive verb
Etymology: Middle French entraper, from en- + trape trap
1 : to catch in or as if in a trap
2 : to lure into a compromising statement or act
synonym see CATCH


Well then it sounds like she's trying to bait him into saying something. Just my opinion, but I don't see how anyone can know that someone else is about to lie about some important information, unless they were conspiring together. Obviously much more to this story
  #5  
Old 01-27-2006, 02:55 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,503
Quote:
Originally Posted by levathian860
I'm currently involved in a case against my ex-boyfriend who is charged with domestic violence. He has a long history of threatening me and I was wondering if I could record his threats or important information he plans to lie about with or without him knowing and use it as evidence in court? I live in Illinois. Thanks for any information.
I believe Illinois is one of the states which require all parties to the conversation have to made aware and agree to allow a tape recording. So no, you can't tape any conversations without informing him you are doing so. Of course, anything in the way of a threatening message that is left on your telephone answering machine is fair game.

The following may apply:

(720 ILCS 5/14-2) (from Ch. 38, par. 14-2)
Sec. 14-2. Elements of the offense; affirmative defense.
(a) A person commits eavesdropping when he:
(1) Knowingly and intentionally uses an eavesdropping device for the
purpose of hearing or recording all or any part of any conversation
or intercepts, retains, or transcribes electronic communication
unless he does so (A) with the consent of all of the parties to
such conversation
or electronic communication
  #6  
Old 01-27-2006, 10:03 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 14,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by levathian860
I'm currently involved in a case against my ex-boyfriend who is charged with domestic violence. He has a long history of threatening me and I was wondering if I could record his threats or important information he plans to lie about with or without him knowing and use it as evidence in court? I live in Illinois. Thanks for any information.
If your ex assaulted you, you should have received a Protection Order, if you have one and the ex is still contacting you in ANY way...that is a violation of the order...Call your police department and report it at once.
You should also talk to someone in Victim Wittness about the threats.
  #7  
Old 01-27-2006, 09:54 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by outonbail
I believe Illinois is one of the states which require all parties to the conversation have to made aware and agree to allow a tape recording. So no, you can't tape any conversations without informing him you are doing so. Of course, anything in the way of a threatening message that is left on your telephone answering machine is fair game.

The following may apply:

(720 ILCS 5/14-2) (from Ch. 38, par. 14-2)
Sec. 14-2. Elements of the offense; affirmative defense.
(a) A person commits eavesdropping when he:
(1) Knowingly and intentionally uses an eavesdropping device for the
purpose of hearing or recording all or any part of any conversation
or intercepts, retains, or transcribes electronic communication
unless he does so (A) with the consent of all of the parties to
such conversation
or electronic communication

See this is where it gets blurry because I wouldn't be eavesdropping, I'd be having a recorded conversation with him. I know on those TV court shows in Chicago they have secretly recorded conversations entered as evidence.

The reason I know he'll say something incriminating is because he has in the past. He frequently threatens me. Right now he's trying to threaten me out of testifying against him. That's what I intend on recording him doing. I was thinking about starting a conversation about the case, and asking him what he wants to do, what he'll do if I go to court.

I do have a order of protection, but not and exclusive one so he still gets to live here. I'm looking for a new place though.
  #8  
Old 01-27-2006, 09:58 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by outonbail
How would you know he is about to lie about important information? Sounds like your trying to entrap him into saying something?

The lie was he told the judge he didn't talk to me for two weeks when he had talked to me in both of the past few days. I was hoping somehow I could say something like "remember what you said the night before we went to court" and then having that conversation compared to the court recorded testimony. He's lied about a lot of stuff though, because if he didn't he'd have no defense.
  #9  
Old 01-28-2006, 01:46 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,503
Quote:
Originally Posted by levathian860
See this is where it gets blurry because I wouldn't be eavesdropping, I'd be having a recorded conversation with him. I know on those TV court shows in Chicago they have secretly recorded conversations entered as evidence.

The reason I know he'll say something incriminating is because he has in the past. He frequently threatens me. Right now he's trying to threaten me out of testifying against him. That's what I intend on recording him doing. I was thinking about starting a conversation about the case, and asking him what he wants to do, what he'll do if I go to court.

I do have a order of protection, but not and exclusive one so he still gets to live here. I'm looking for a new place though.
I don't understand how come your living with him if he's so threatening? That just doesn't make any sense at all. It will certainly take credibility away from any claims of being in fear of your life.

You will be committing eavesdropping according to my interpretation

(a) A person commits eavesdropping when he:

(1) Knowingly and intentionally uses an eavesdropping device for hearing or recording

A tape recording device, attached to the phone line, is an eavesdropping device. If he lives with you, I assume you will be using a device like radio shack sells, which starts the recorder automatically whenever the phone's handset is lifted off of the receiver, whether your home or not. But even if you use some device you have to turn on yourself, it will be illegal unless:

(A) with the consent of all of the parties to such conversation.

So if your breaking the law to obtain this evidence, it will not be allowed.

One other thing, television is for news and entertainment and rarely depicts reality...
  #10  
Old 01-28-2006, 03:32 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: California
Posts: 18,456
Send a message via AIM to CdwJava Send a message via Yahoo to CdwJava
Some (maybe most) states have an exception when taping to intercept threats or obtaining evidence of a criminal conspiracy, larceny, or one of an assortment of crimes. So, there may be no crime to record the coversation depending on the circumstances.

You should really check with an attorney (DA, domestic violence advocate - someone) whether or not your situation will permit such a surreptitious recording or not.

My state might permit a recording in these circumstances (depending ont he details) and I cannot imagine CA is alone in that.

In fact:

"* * * The following activities shall be exempt from the provisions of this Article:
(i) Recording of a conversation made by or at the request of a person , not a law enforcement officer or agent of a law enforcement officer, who is a party to the conversation , under reasonable suspicion that another party to the conversation is committing, is about to commit, or has committed a criminal offense against the person or a member of his or her immediate household, and there is reason to believe that evidence of the criminal offense may be obtained by the recording."


A discussion of the law from the IL Attorney General in 1996 can be found at:

[url]http://www.ag.state.il.us/opinions/1996/96-036.html[/url]


- Carl
__________________
A Nor Cal Cop Sergeant

"Make mine a double mocha ...
And a croissant!"

He Who Kneels Before God
Can Stand Before Anyone

....author unknown

Last edited by CdwJava; 01-28-2006 at 03:41 AM.
  #11  
Old 01-28-2006, 07:04 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,503
Very good Carl, I hadn't seen that article. I read the link you provided (several times) it does go around in circles a bit, but it does end by saying it would be OK for one party of the conversation to record the conversation if the believe they will obtain evidence to a crime or one which is about to happen.

Now if the OP lives with the person she is trying to record, then she can not simply place a recording device on the phone line and record all his conversations. Only one she is party to and which she is told of a crime that has occurred, is happening or is about to happen.

They don't clearly identify what type of crime but it does hint at a crime that would harm the party or a member of their family. If I'm reading it correctly?
  #12  
Old 01-28-2006, 04:28 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: California
Posts: 18,456
Send a message via AIM to CdwJava Send a message via Yahoo to CdwJava
I would think that she might have an exception in there somewhere. However, there may also be subsequent court rulings that have further modified this. The OP should really speak to an attorney before doing this.

- Carl
__________________
A Nor Cal Cop Sergeant

"Make mine a double mocha ...
And a croissant!"

He Who Kneels Before God
Can Stand Before Anyone

....author unknown
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.