![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Taped recordingsFlorida While in jail all outgoing calls are recorded. Can these calls be used against you if there is no warrant issued for your calls. I cannot find a case of yes or no anywhere. Surely someone has questioned this before? |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| How much privacy were you expecting in jail? Last edited by OhBullship; 02-16-2005 at 12:13 PM. Reason: I hope no one saw that |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| The right to discuss my case. I did implicate myself but I want to know if this can be used against me with no other corrobaration |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Were you talking with your lawyer, or bettyLou from the trailer park? |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Q: Can these calls be used against you if there is no warrant issued for your calls. A: Yes. No warrant is required because there is no search. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "I did implicate myself but I want to know if this can be used against me with no other corrobaration" Sure, it's called a confession.
__________________ Cal Naughton, Jr.: I like to think of Jesus as a mischievous badger. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
|
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Even if it cannot be used against him it can be used against the person he was talking with, can't it? I'm still learning and I mess up occasionally. If he was discussing it with a friend, couldn't his friend be forced to testify about what was said? If the friend lies, couldn't the tape be proof of perjury? |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Q: Even if it cannot be used against him it can be used against the person he was talking with, can't it? A: No one said it couldn't be used against him and yes it can be used against the other person. Q: If he was discussing it with a friend, couldn't his friend be forced to testify about what was said? A: I am unaware of any method that would be successful to make a person testify. All a witness has to say is, "I don't remember" and that's the end of that. Q: If the friend lies, couldn't the tape be proof of perjury? A: If the friend lies on the stand under oath, then the tape could be used to impeach his credibility (fancy lawyer talk for "you're a liar") AND possibly for a perjury charge (if it was a material lie; read the perjury statutes). |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Thanks ![]() If he had been talking with his lawyer, would the conversation have been recorded? Originally I believed they could use it against him because he should not believe he has any privacy while in jail. I was equating it to talking with an officer before Miranda. If you confess before being officially questioned, your confession counts. I know that's too simplistic, but it's a basic rule I believe. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Q: If he had been talking with his lawyer, would the conversation have been recorded? A: You would have to ask the jailer that. Q: Originally I believed they could use it against him because he should not believe he has any privacy while in jail. A: You are correct. Q: I was equating it to talking with an officer before Miranda. If you confess before being officially questioned, your confession counts. I know that's too simplistic, but it's a basic rule I believe. A: You are correct. If the officer says to the waitress, "One doughnut, please. I'm on a diet" and the waitress says, "Before I came to work this morning, I killed my husband and here's how I did it." And then confesses. That's a good confession. |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Thanks again. ![]() |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
The bill is in the mail. |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
If you won't accept a smile you will have to extend credit ![]() |
![]() |