Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Auto Accidents and Vehicle Claims : Visit FreeAdvice.com for useful articles and FAQs on Bike Accidents, Bus Accidents, Car Accidents, Motorcycle Accidents, Truck Accidents, etc. Visit AttorneyPages.com to find an experienced Car Accident Lawyer.
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > ACCIDENT AND INJURY LAW > Auto Accidents and Vehicle Claims




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-20-2007, 12:21 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6

Any responsibility for stepson's driving?


We live in Virginia.

My husband has a teenage son who lives in NJ. We do not see him and he never visits us. When the custody agreement was made about 7 years ago, my husband was supposed to have his son every other weekend and alternating holidays. This did not last long and we now live 6 hours away.

His son is going to be driving soon. We will have no way of knowing if he is a responsible driver or if his mother is going to supervise his actions. Should he be responsible for an accident in any way, serious or not, is there any situation where WE could be sued?

If so, what precautions do we take to protect ourselves and our assets?
  #2  
Old 01-20-2007, 05:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: california
Posts: 7,789
Hubby and you can be sued only if his son ends up driving a car owned by hubby or you.
__________________
Cal Naughton, Jr.: I like to think of Jesus as a mischievous badger.
  #3  
Old 01-20-2007, 06:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,725
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephenk View Post
Hubby and you can be sued only if his son ends up driving a car owned by hubby or you.
Actually, they can be sued even if the vehicle is NOT owned by hubby (or OP). However, the likelihood of that suit being successful is very very low.
  #4  
Old 01-21-2007, 12:58 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: california
Posts: 7,789
What scenario would result in dad being sued?
__________________
Cal Naughton, Jr.: I like to think of Jesus as a mischievous badger.
  #5  
Old 01-21-2007, 11:06 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 17,849
They COULD sue the kid's parents just because he's a minor. Remember, anyone can sue anyone for whatever they want. But if the kid lives in a different state and never sees his dad and wasn't driving dad's car, then it's highly unlikely that any judge would hold dad responsible for anything done by kid.
  #6  
Old 01-21-2007, 11:56 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,725
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecmst12 View Post
They COULD sue the kid's parents just because he's a minor. Remember, anyone can sue anyone for whatever they want. But if the kid lives in a different state and never sees his dad and wasn't driving dad's car, then it's highly unlikely that any judge would hold dad responsible for anything done by kid.
Exactly what I was thinking
  #7  
Old 01-21-2007, 03:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: california
Posts: 7,789
In my 16 years of practice as an insurance defense attorney I have never had a non-custodial parent sued for an auto accident involving their child when the child was with the custodial parent and was not driving the non-custodial parent's vehicle.

an attorney wouldn't want to risk a malicious prosecution action for bringing in a non-custodial parent for an accident involving their child that is living in another state with the custodial parent.
__________________
Cal Naughton, Jr.: I like to think of Jesus as a mischievous badger.
  #8  
Old 01-22-2007, 08:30 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6
Thanks for your replies. I feel better now. He won't ever be in our care or driving our cars.
  #9  
Old 01-22-2007, 09:24 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,725
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephenk View Post
In my 16 years of practice as an insurance defense attorney I have never had a non-custodial parent sued for an auto accident involving their child when the child was with the custodial parent and was not driving the non-custodial parent's vehicle.

an attorney wouldn't want to risk a malicious prosecution action for bringing in a non-custodial parent for an accident involving their child that is living in another state with the custodial parent.
I can easily see said NCP being named as a co-defendant and them being removed as such once the actual relationship is worked out.
  #10  
Old 01-22-2007, 09:43 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zigner View Post
I can easily see said NCP being named as a co-defendant and them being removed as such once the actual relationship is worked out.
That still leaves the door open for mom to turn around and take dad back to court to recoup half of the money she loses in the lawsuit.
__________________
Whatever women do they must do twice as well as men to be thought half as good. Luckily, this is not difficult.

Carpe Ominous
  #11  
Old 01-23-2007, 01:54 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: california
Posts: 7,789
Huh? On what basis?
__________________
Cal Naughton, Jr.: I like to think of Jesus as a mischievous badger.
  #12  
Old 01-23-2007, 04:21 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephenk View Post
Huh? On what basis?
Family courts consider EACH parent equally responsible for the child. I've seen cases like this go both ways, especially in cases where the NCP helps out with insurance, car payments or other car/driving related expenses. The fact that dad has not seen the child in years and years could just as easily hurt his defense as it could help it. He could argue that since has no active role in deciding if the child is responsible enough to drive, he shouldn't be held responsible. But then, the question is, who's fault is it that he doesn't have a relationship with the child?
__________________
Whatever women do they must do twice as well as men to be thought half as good. Luckily, this is not difficult.

Carpe Ominous
  #13  
Old 01-23-2007, 01:28 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6
We pay child support through the court. We do not make any payments towards any car related expenses.

We live in completely different states and if we want to get technical...it is the mother who is preventing a relationship with the child. Further, from the beginning, she has never consulted with his father on any of the matters relating to the child....there would be no way for my husband to even find out if he's driving or if he's being responsible. Neither mother nor child communicate such things to my husband even when he has asked.

My first posted asked "If so, what precautions do we take to protect ourselves and our assets?" So for those of you who say we CAN get sued....how do we protect ourselves?

Last edited by Treesh; 01-23-2007 at 01:44 PM.
  #14  
Old 01-23-2007, 02:07 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,725
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treesh View Post
So for those of you who say we CAN get sued....how do we protect ourselves?
And that brings us back to the fact that anyone can sue anyone for anything at any time. I don't think there's much more you CAN do to protect yourself. However, I also think that any cost too defend yourself would be pretty minimal.
  #15  
Old 01-23-2007, 10:26 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: california
Posts: 7,789
"The fact that dad has not seen the child in years and years could just as easily hurt his defense as it could help it. He could argue that since has no active role in deciding if the child is responsible enough to drive, he shouldn't be held responsible. But then, the question is, who's fault is it that he doesn't have a relationship with the child?"

None of which has anything to do with dad ever being brought into a lawsuit as a result of his son driving a vehicle not owned by dad and while in legal custody of mom in another state.

Even if dad contributed to payment of auto insurance for the kid that doesn't raise any legal cause of action to bring dad into any lawsuit.

To orginal poster, protect yourself by having complete auto insurance and homeowner insurance. That's about it.
__________________
Cal Naughton, Jr.: I like to think of Jesus as a mischievous badger.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:53 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.