Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Auto Accidents and Vehicle Claims : Visit FreeAdvice.com for useful articles and FAQs on Bike Accidents, Bus Accidents, Car Accidents, Motorcycle Accidents, Truck Accidents, etc. Visit AttorneyPages.com to find an experienced Car Accident Lawyer.
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > ACCIDENT AND INJURY LAW > Auto Accidents and Vehicle Claims




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-14-2006, 05:39 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3

Is this even remotely right?


What is the name of your state? South Carolina

My son was hit head on by a driver of an 18 wheeler a week ago. The owner of the truck has Canal insurance. The driver was charged with DUI and arrested at the scene.
My son was the 3rd car hit, but recieved the most damage. He drove a 1974 Chevelle that was totaled. The state trooper and the investigator say the sturdiness of this vehicle is what saved his life.
Yesterday, the adjuster called him to say "the car has been totaled-- you can not get a rental-Due to the age of the vehicle the offer is $900 for your settlement."
I assume this is for the vehicle ONLY? Right?
He was not injured badly(thank God) However, he does have an emergency room bill, x-rays, prescriptions, and 4 days of lost wages. I assume the owner's insurance will pay all of this without any trouble Right? It was filed on my son's BCBS the day of the accident.
I guess my question is--- Without significant injury, is my son screwed? He will never replace his "family heirloom car"(sentimental value but it ran great) with ANYTHING drivable for $900. So is that it? Does he accept this settlement with his med bills and his lost wages paid?

Last edited by Mom of Rick; 10-15-2006 at 12:52 AM. Reason: typos
  #2  
Old 10-14-2006, 06:02 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,106
The insurer is not obligated to offer or pay replacement value on any vehicle only its fair market value at the time of the accident. So yeah that sounds right.

Property damage can be settled separately from personal injury and often is. Just make sure that any settlement documents he signs do not included a waiver for claims of personal injury. Wait several months before settling the personal injury claims to make sure there are no residual physical maladies.
  #3  
Old 10-14-2006, 09:33 PM
ISUE4YOU2
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Your son is owed the actual cash value or fair market value of the vehicle prior to the accident and loss of its use; i.e. whatever it would have sold for prior to the accident, and an amount to compensate for being without the vehicle from the date of the accident until the date of the settlement check. You need to ask the insurance adjuster for the other party what documentation he relies on for his settlement offer, and if he does not provide it speak with his supervisor.

Your son is entitled to his reasonable medical bills, reasonable gross loss of earnings, and a reasonable amount for pain and suffering.

You can settle the property damage and loss of use claim separately from the bodily injury liability claim; make sure any release only refers to property damage and loss of use and not bodily injury.
  #4  
Old 10-14-2006, 11:43 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mom of Rick View Post
Because he will never replace his "family heirloom car"
As the owner of "family heirloom cars" as you put it, why would something so valuable to the family not be insured for it's perceived full replacement value? Or is this "family heirloom" not really worth as much as you think and the insurance on the vehicle was your state's minimum coverage? I am active in the collector car hobby and own a couple myself (66 GTO, 69 Torino Cobra), both vehicles are fully insured for their full replacement value. Except for a few exceptions, most models of the 1974 Chevelle have not reached any sort of status as a collectible vehicle. A $900 offer makes me feel the car was a basic transportation car that was approaching "beater" status.
__________________
If you feel my answer is rude, mean, snarky or in anyway not to your liking, I did my job. You don't need to tell me.

No private messages, I do not reply to them.
  #5  
Old 10-15-2006, 01:19 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3

Is this remotely right?


I thank you ALL for your replies. This has been an eye opener for all of us.

TO reply #3-- "family heirloom" was just what we referred to his car as. It belonged first to my husband--- passed down to my son. He's driven it since he was 16 and is the only car he's ever had. Now, he is 23. My husband and son had started replacing the interior on the car as they found pieces for it. They rebuilt the motor and transmission. about a year ago and it was re-painted about 3 years ago. It was more sentimental value than anything else. Right now---with Mom and Dad paying the bills and the price to insure 4 kids under the age of 25 we have kept 2nd level liabilty only on their cars. Collector's insurance in SC is often cheaper than full coverage. He would have gotten this when the car was fully done, I'm sure I hope that explains more to you. Good luck on your collections--
  #6  
Old 10-15-2006, 09:02 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 17,858
If he has the receipts for the parts he put into the car recently, he may be able to get some additional reimbursement for that.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.