• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

To: Karen22

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Status
Not open for further replies.

NYMinute

Member
A few years ago, my ins co. would just cut me a check to take to any place to get my car fixed.....
NOW, they tell me to find a place and get an estimate or two and they have to be fully licensed to repair cars.

I dont know if your intention is to NOT get your car fixed and keep the cash, but trust me, just get your car fixed and have the ins. co. pay for it. You'll spend more money and time trying to get the cash and insurance companies for the most part SUCK anyway.

You pay them your premiums like clockwork and they give you NO lee way......
 


JETX

Senior Member
Why did you post this 'orphan' here and not on the appropriate thread??
Did you not think for a NY minute??
 

JETX

Senior Member
Gee, and I guess you are so stupid that you don't understand what LOCKED means....
Or that you just assumed that anyone with an interest in that LOCKED thread would find your post.... or that it was of any value???

Simply, you are an idiot.
 

NYMinute

Member
no, it's obvious that YOU are since you asked the question in the first place.....now crawl back to your trailer park...
 

JETX

Senior Member
Hey, have those pygmy's ever gotten hold of you for running that illegal online gambling site??

Did you repay the $6000 you stole from them?

Do you double-lock your doors for the time that Vito comes by to pay a visit??

Do you constantly look over your shoulder to see if the IRS or FBI is following you??

Did you ever get caught for that bankruptcy fraud you did back in 1997??

Just from the above, we can tell you are an idiot. And it didn't even take your sophomoric post on this thread!!
 

NYMinute

Member
LOL ummm onine gambling is NOT illegal!!!
I got the advice I was looking for from my brother in law who is an attorney...I didnt want to ask him because I didnt want to get him involved but I did and got the answer I was looking for!!
How old are you anyway?
 
H

hexeliebe

Guest
LOL ummm onine gambling is NOT illegal!!!
think again grasshopper:

Your statement is all inclusive. In other words, you have not said that 'certain gambling activities are not Illegal online. Which is blatantly false.

In 1961, Congress enacted the Wire Act as a part of series of antiracketeering laws. The Wire Act complements other federal bookmaking statutes, such as the Travel Act (interstate travel in aid of racketeering enterprises, including gambling), the Interstate Transportation of Wagering Paraphernalia Act, and the Illegal Gambling Business Act (requires a predicate state law violation).

In order to prove a prima facie case, the government must establish that:

1. The person was "engaged in the business of betting or wagering"
(compared with a casual bettor);

2. The person transmitted in interstate or foreign commerce:
(a) bets or wagers,
(b) information assisting in the placement of bets or wagers, or
(c) a communication that entitled the recipient to receive money or credit as a result of a bet or wager;

3. The person used a " wire communication facility;" and

4. The person knowingly used a wire communication facility to engage in one of the three prohibited forms of transmissions.


Currently, nonsports betting is interpreted as legal" under the Wire Act.
Case law: most notably the recent decision by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, clearly supports this conclusion. In In re MasterCard Int'l, et al., a class action against several banks and credit card companies alleged unlawful interaction with Internet casinos in violation of RICO. The various defendants moved to dismiss the action under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The court held that the plain language of the Wire Act was limited to gambling on a sporting event or related contest. The court reasoned that:


[T]he recent legislative history of internet gambling legislation reinforces the Court's determination that internet gambling on a game of chance is not prohibited conduct under 18 U.S.C. § 1084. Recent legislative attempts have sought to amend the Wire Act to encompass "contest of chance. . ." the "Internet Gambling Prohibition Act of 1999" . . . sought to amend Title 18 to prohibit the use of the internet to place a bet or wager upon a "contest of others, a sporting event, or a game of chance. . . ."

The case is currently on appeal to the Fifth Circuit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top