• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

My car is totaled - what does he pay?

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Status
Not open for further replies.

bcam

Junior Member
This is a California situation.

A man backed-up thru an intersection and plowed into my dirver's door. No brakes - just a straight shot as I was making a legal left hand turn.

He apologized. Said he didn't mean it. I'll accept that.
His Insurance Agent said his client was responsible. OK by me.

Question:
My 1994 Ford Explorer is totaled. Are they responsible to simply pay me the Blue Book Value, or are they required to "make me whole". Truck was in excellent shape and paid for years ago. I had no plans to assume more debt and buy a new car - but here I am. What's the general approach in a situation like this?

Thanks in Advance
 


racer72

Senior Member
You will get closer to NADA value than blue book. I would suggest looking for similar vehicles for sale in your area to use as a bargaining tool when the insurance company low balls you.
 

JETX

Senior Member
bcam said:
My 1994 Ford Explorer is totaled. Are they responsible to simply pay me the Blue Book Value, or are they required to "make me whole".
They are only obligated to pay you FMV (Fair Market Value) for the vehicle in its condition immediately prior to the accident.
 
T

Trucking Mad

Guest
bcam said:
This is a California situation.

A man backed-up thru an intersection and plowed into my dirver's door. No brakes - just a straight shot as I was making a legal left hand turn.

He apologized. Said he didn't mean it. I'll accept that.
His Insurance Agent said his client was responsible. OK by me.

Question:
My 1994 Ford Explorer is totaled. Are they responsible to simply pay me the Blue Book Value, or are they required to "make me whole". Truck was in excellent shape and paid for years ago. I had no plans to assume more debt and buy a new car - but here I am. What's the general approach in a situation like this?

Thanks in Advance
Do you have an repair estimate. Who told you your vehicle was totaled the repair firm or the ins. Co. or is this what you assume.
If your vehicle is totaled the ins. Co will give you F.M.V. which is typically equal to wholesale value.
Totaled means the repairs of your vehicle exceed 60% of the value
 

JETX

Senior Member
Trucking Mad said:
F.M.V. which is typically equal to wholesale value.
And of course, that is NOT correct. Fair Market Value is "the price that an interested but not desperate buyer would be willing to pay and an interested but not desperate seller would be willing to accept on the open market assuming a reasonable period of time for an agreement to arise."

Totaled means the repairs of your vehicle exceed 60% of the value
And of course, that is not necessary correct either. The insurance company determines what is considered a total loss or not... based on their own criteria.
 
T

Trucking Mad

Guest
JETX said:
And of course, that is NOT correct. Fair Market Value is "the price that an interested but not desperate buyer would be willing to pay and an interested but not desperate seller would be willing to accept on the open market assuming a reasonable period of time for an agreement to arise."


And of course, that is not necessary correct either. The insurance company determines what is considered a total loss or not... based on their own criteria.
Do you know this to be fact or do you assume your right and i'm wrong. How do you base your info.? Most Ins. Co. and repair Co. classify a vehicle as a total lose if the vehicle repairs exceed 60% of the value. Most Ins. (which means not all!) Most repair Co. ( which means not all!) If the op takes his vehicle to a repair firm and they determine the vehicle is a total lose the Ins. co will have their own adjuster determine the value and the damage amount. Then based on the adjusters info the Ins. co will make an offer to settle which will not be in favor of the op.
 
S

shell007

Guest
Just some info.

Last year my vehicle had a damage value of 82%. It was not considered a total loss because the Ins. Co. stated "no total loss unless 85%".

So...yes.. every ins. CO. follows their own guidelines. It's not an "across the board" type thing.
 
Last edited:
S

shell007

Guest
My 1994 Ford Explorer is totaled. Are they responsible to simply pay me the Blue Book Value, or are they required to "make me whole". Truck was in excellent shape and paid for years ago
In addition regarding "making you whole": That really only applies when you purchase a vehicle (NEW not USED). If you purchase GAP insurance through your insurance Company this would then cover the difference between the amount you owe and the amount the vehicle is actually worth.
 
Trucking Mad said:
Do you know this to be fact or do you assume your right and i'm wrong. How do you base your info.? Most Ins. Co. and repair Co. classify a vehicle as a total lose if the vehicle repairs exceed 60% of the value. Most Ins. (which means not all!) Most repair Co. ( which means not all!) If the op takes his vehicle to a repair firm and they determine the vehicle is a total lose the Ins. co will have their own adjuster determine the value and the damage amount. Then based on the adjusters info the Ins. co will make an offer to settle which will not be in favor of the op.
JET is correct, as usual. The difference between repair estimates and value can be as high as 85%, depending on the carrier. In fact, 60% is fairly low. That's good from an insured's perspective (most people don't want to retain a vehicle with extensive repairs), but not from an insurer's perspective.
 
T

Trucking Mad

Guest
InsuranceLadyAZ said:
JET is correct, as usual. The difference between repair estimates and value can be as high as 85%, depending on the carrier. In fact, 60% is fairly low. That's good from an insured's perspective (most people don't want to retain a vehicle with extensive repairs), but not from an insurer's perspective.
Thus what I said before MOST. I'll get back to you on this.
 
S

shell007

Guest
Trucking Mad said:
Thus what I said before MOST. I'll get back to you on this.
Get back to "the insurancelady" about what?

The OP has been given all pertinent correct information by three seperate posters. :)

What is there dispute here? :rolleyes:
 
T

Trucking Mad

Guest
shellandty said:
Get back to "the insurancelady" about what?

The OP has been given all pertinent correct information by three seperate posters. :)

What is there dispute here? :rolleyes:
Hi there. What is your point?
 
T

Trucking Mad

Guest
shellandty said:
Hi there! :)

My point was.... "wondering what your point was"!!!
Thats what i'm going to get back on. Because I wasn't finished.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top