| <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Arial, Helvetica, Verdana">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by dkline0654:
My son let a girl drive his car around the block (she turned out to be 14 and unlicensed). She hit someone and caused $1000 damage to my son's car. Her mother is now stating that she is not liable for her daughter's damages because she did not give her permission to drive the vehicle and her attorney said she does not have to pay for it. They had, up until now, been promising to pay for it. Do we have any recourse against mother? 14 year old?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
My response:
They are both liable, equally. She had a duty to inform that she was unlicensed, and he had a duty to ask. A judge would split the baby. Take it to Small Claims court. It doesn't matter that her mother didn't give the daughter permission. If she's old enough to take on an "adult" task, such as driving, then it will be under that guideline that a judge will impute adult standards to her and that she knew that what she was doing was wrong, and find her 50% negligent. Your son should have known better, and to have asked her first. He'll get hit with 50% also.
IAAL
------------------
By reading the “Response” to your question or comment, you agree that: The opinions expressed herein by "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE" are designed to provide educational information only and are not intended to, nor do they, offer legal advice. Opinions expressed to you in this site are not intended to, nor does it, create an attorney-client relationship, nor does it constitute legal advice to any person reviewing such information. No electronic communication with "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE," on its own, will generate an attorney-client relationship, nor will it be considered an attorney-client privileged communication. You further agree that you will obtain your own attorney's advice and counsel for your questions responded to herein by "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE."
| 
Linear Mode
