Lynx 36 said:
Quote: "No she is right about 3xspecials,"
Really!? Where did you get this info. from? Haven't you read the replies from the numerous posters on this board that there is no set amount when it comes to pain and suffering? Insurance companies are being much less generous w/ settlements these days and 3x or 5x is not a set number anymore. Why are they able to do this? It's b/c they are winning in court that's why.
Or maybe you would like to enlighten us w/ all the personal injury claims you have settled. I've never given anyone 3x their meds unless they are dead.
Please stop giving people wrong info. or getting their hopes up.
Just answer my question f/ the 15th time. Where do you have any claims adjusting experience from? You never want to answer that question I've asked many times before. You're a clueless idiot when it comes to your advice on claims, so do us a favor and stay out of forums you know nothing about.
You were proven wrong the other day on the civil case on the injury claim. Do I have to prove you wrong here too? Even Belize Breeze will back me on this one, as I have seen him post numerous times that 3x and 5x is not a valid number anymore.
She may get some money but it may not be 3x her meds.
If you look at many of the threads where you have responded, it was your credentials that was questioned, not mine, including a recent thread re manslaughter.
OP said, "I've heard that a proper amount would be 3x the initial medical bills making the amount $21k. Any thoughts?"
My point it acknowledging that 3xspecials is a common formula she may have heard and then went on and explained why she should not expect that kind of a settlement, but as usual you don't read the response. You also acknowledged the formula by stating, "3x and 5x is not a valid number anymore." also acknowlidging what she had heard. It is nor based on what insurance companies decide, but on what is decided in court or out of court decisions where the plaintiff makes a decision based on the facts of their case, whether to accept the insurance company's settlement offer, or to risk taking the issue to court. There is a greater chance of a larger award or settlement when there are lingering injuries, but as I informed OP she does not have that kind of a case and by the time the costs are subtracted from what ever settlement she might win, more than likely she would end up with less than she is offered now and she might be better off taking the settlement and paying her bills. That is a far cry from what you are claiming.
"Please stop giving people wrong info. or getting their hopes up."
Please read the posts in the future and stop misrepresenting what is said so you and make a fool of yourself.