F
fett76
Guest
My wife and her brother were rear-ended while sitting at a red light at an intersection. The other driver was cited. We are handling the claim through the other party's insurance company which is handling medical costs (which are minor) and the cost of car repairs/rental car. Two days after the claim was filed, the adjuster offered my brother-in-law (who had no injuries) a $100 settlement provided he agreed never to sue. My wife (who owns the car, was driving, and was sore but thinks she is ok and is seeking a chiropractic evaluation) was offered $500. how should I evaluate these offers in terms of pain and suffering and, more importantly, the waiver of a right to sue? We aren't looking to take advantage of the insurance company and will not sue unless things take a drastic turn for the worse, but $500 seems too low to waive out right to sue. How do I determine what is reasonable and realistic and how does my wife approach the insurance company? Any input would be appreciated. (Arizona)