My husband was in a motorcycle accident and the auto insurance company paid a settlement to us . Our lawyers told us that they can't release the check till the first hospital he was at gives us a zero balance for the time he was there. The medical insurance denied payment because the claim was not billed in a timely manner and under their contract with the hospital it says they have a right to deny payment and that we are not responsible for that bill. Shouldn't that be enough for them to release the check?
NO, that is not enough to permit the attorneys to "
release the check"! And your big mistake is in the mistaken premise that "
we" are not responsible for that bill. Moreover I'm much disinclined to believe that your "medical insurance" carrier would be so foolish as to tell you that
"we are not responsible."
The patient's liability for the medical care is totally independent of available insurance coverage. The only question here might be whether or not the hospital perfected its statutory lien upon the settlement as provided in Sections 3045 et seq. of the California Civil Code.
Circumstances here would indicate that the hospital lien has been perfected. If so, the attorneys are bound to honor it in making distribution of the settlement, or pay it out of their own pockets. (See: Section 3054.4)
If I were in your shoes, I would be looking into the issue of whether or not the hospital's claim was properly denied by the insurance company. This business of the carrier getting off of the hook because of its "
contract with the hospital" smells of week old fish. If you haven't addressed this specific issue with the attorneys, then do so.