confuzzzzled
Junior Member
What is the name of your state? CA
I understand that the Insurance provides a lawyer up to the pi limit. Anything beyond that I need to get my own lawyer.
But here's my confusion (the amounts listed below are hypothetical):
If my pi limit is 200,000 and the person suing me is seeking 300,000, does that mean that the insurance company is not going to provide me with a lawyer at all, and I'm stuck with hiring my own lawyer plus paying for depositions, etc to protect the 300,000?
Doesn't the insurance company have an interest in protecting their 200,000; thus providing me with a lawyer? And then I hire an additional lawyer to protect the extra 100,000? Then the costs for depositions, etc, are divided between the insurance company and myself on a 2:1 ratio respectively? Is this correct?
Hypothetically, if the insurance company isn't going to provide me with a lawyer at all, I could not respond to the suit and have a default judgement filed against me. Then I would seek chapter 7 bankruptcy (assuming I have no assets, and earn less that state median income). The insurance company would have to pay the 200,000...I would save money by not having to hire a pi defense lawyer + depositions, etc. Sure I would have bad credit for the next 10 years, but I wouldn't be planning on purchasing any major assets.
I understand that the Insurance provides a lawyer up to the pi limit. Anything beyond that I need to get my own lawyer.
But here's my confusion (the amounts listed below are hypothetical):
If my pi limit is 200,000 and the person suing me is seeking 300,000, does that mean that the insurance company is not going to provide me with a lawyer at all, and I'm stuck with hiring my own lawyer plus paying for depositions, etc to protect the 300,000?
Doesn't the insurance company have an interest in protecting their 200,000; thus providing me with a lawyer? And then I hire an additional lawyer to protect the extra 100,000? Then the costs for depositions, etc, are divided between the insurance company and myself on a 2:1 ratio respectively? Is this correct?
Hypothetically, if the insurance company isn't going to provide me with a lawyer at all, I could not respond to the suit and have a default judgement filed against me. Then I would seek chapter 7 bankruptcy (assuming I have no assets, and earn less that state median income). The insurance company would have to pay the 200,000...I would save money by not having to hire a pi defense lawyer + depositions, etc. Sure I would have bad credit for the next 10 years, but I wouldn't be planning on purchasing any major assets.
Last edited: