| | |
 | 
06-25-2005, 06:24 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1
| | | What Does The Law Say I live in tyler, texas. While playing golf my tee shot went way right and struck a moving car while leaving the golf course community. I do not know the proper protocal on such an event. The owner of the car is wanting me to pay for damages. What does the law say when it pertains to an active sport such as golf and an accident occurs. Am i exempt from liability or will I be held liable?
everyone tells me something different. | 
06-26-2005, 06:05 AM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,607
| | | It was your ball so pay up. | 
06-26-2005, 08:00 AM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,509
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by rewcsw Am i exempt from liability or will I be held liable? | You are liable due to your negligence (inability to keep the ball on the course.... and yet still decided to play the game).
__________________ There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).
Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport! | 
06-26-2005, 09:05 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1
| | | easy to understand In the state of texas you are liable only if you were negligent(failing to do the right thing) in your attempt to hit the ball.
Example: If you tried to cut a corner of the desired path of the fairway... or if you kept hitting ball after ball until you were happy with the one that entered the fairway.
each person assumes their own risk when in or near a resort area or athletic area such as a golf course, tennis courts and ball fields.
Each person should turn this in to each insurance company. Let the insurance companies work things out. This would be the quickest and most viable step to close this situation. | 
06-26-2005, 11:54 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: california
Posts: 7,789
| | | "negligent(failing to do the right thing)"
That's your definition of negligence?
__________________
Cal Naughton, Jr.: I like to think of Jesus as a mischievous badger.
| 
06-27-2005, 07:59 AM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,509
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by judgej In the state of texas you are liable only if you were negligent(failing to do the right thing) in your attempt to hit the ball.
Example: If you tried to cut a corner of the desired path of the fairway... or if you kept hitting ball after ball until you were happy with the one that entered the fairway.
each person assumes their own risk when in or near a resort area or athletic area such as a golf course, tennis courts and ball fields.
Each person should turn this in to each insurance company. Let the insurance companies work things out. This would be the quickest and most viable step to close this situation. | And of course, that is all crap. You clearly have never heard of 'res ipsa loquitor'.
negligence
n. failure to exercise the care toward others which a reasonable or prudent person would do in the circumstances, or taking action which such a reasonable person would not. Negligence is accidental as distinguished from "intentional torts" (assault or trespass, for example) or from crimes, but a crime can also constitute negligence, such as reckless driving. Negligence can result in all types of accidents causing physical and/or property damage, but can also include business errors and miscalculations, such as a sloppy land survey. In making a claim for damages based on an allegation of another's negligence, the injured party (plaintiff) must prove: a) that the party alleged to be negligent had a duty to the injured party-specifically to the one injured or to the general public, b) that the defendant's action (or failure to act) was negligent-not what a reasonably prudent person would have done, c) that the damages were caused ("proximately caused") by the negligence. An added factor in the formula for determining negligence is whether the damages were "reasonably foreseeable" at the time of the alleged carelessness. If the injury is caused by something owned or controlled by the supposedly negligent party, but how the accident actually occurred is not known (like a ton of bricks falls from a construction job), negligence can be found based on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitor (Latin for "the thing speaks for itself").
__________________ There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).
Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport! | 
06-27-2005, 11:06 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 19
| | | Why can't the car owner, put in a claim, and you offer to just pay their deductible? Or is the car owner more looking for revenge than repair?
It should go under comprehensive, and not collision. So, it should not affect their future rates.
Also, does this "golf course community" have rules about this? I mean, does it already spell out liability for golf related property damages in the community rules? Does the "golf course community" have its own insurance for golf related property damages that happen within the community? | 
06-27-2005, 01:48 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: May 2005 Location: Michigan
Posts: 23
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by judgej each person assumes their own risk when in or near a resort area or athletic area such as a golf course, tennis courts and ball fields. | That is the biggest bunch of crap I ever heard. Show me a street sign that say "South Blvd, enter at own risk".
No one assumes risks on a public road near an athletic area. I am sure that the road was there long before the golf/tennis/ball fields were there. | 
06-27-2005, 03:18 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,509
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Sal33n That is the biggest bunch of crap I ever heard. Show me a street sign that say "South Blvd, enter at own risk".
No one assumes risks on a public road near an athletic area. I am sure that the road was there long before the golf/tennis/ball fields were there. | Yep, 'judge' is about to get the carpet pulled out from under him....
In any case, it makes no difference whether the road was there first or not. The ONLY issue is that the golf course is designed so that any COMPETENT player will not hit off the course (out of bounds). The fact that the OP did, is negligence on his part in not being able to control his play.
__________________ There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).
Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport! | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |