Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > BANKRUPTCY AND CONSUMER CREDIT > Banking & Credit Cards

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-19-2005, 11:34 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1

Bank deducted funds from wrong account


What is the name of your state?What is the name of your state? CA

I have two checking accounts and one savings account at my bank. One checking account I share with my wife and the other one is my personal account. In March 2005 I requested a new debit card for my joint account because I misplaced my card at home. The bank sent me two cards, both with my name only on them. The papers that the cards came with gave no indication to what accounts the cards were linked to. I called the bank and they explained that one card was for my personal account and one card was for my joint account. Since I did not want to have extra active cards around, I tore up my old personal card. Also, I marked on the back of each card a P or a J, for personal and joint, so I would know which card is which.

Last week we overdrafted on the joint account. When going over the recent charges, I saw that the bank was charging to the joint account purchases I was making with what I thought was my personal account. Looking at the confirmation numbers that the bank was giving me, I noted that the numbers indeed matched the card number of the personal card, so I was not using the wrong card. I called the bank to explain that they charged the wrong account, however, they refuse to acknowledge any error on their behalf. Evidently, when sending the replacement cards, they linked one card to my joint account, and the other card to my personal account and my joint account. They also linked the VISA charge feature to my joint account for that card. When I called them when I originally received the two cards, the bank gave no mention to the personal card being linked to the joint account, and definately did not mention the VISA was linked to the other account. There are three overdrafts that were charged to my joint account for charges that should have been posted to my personal account. There were sufficient funds in my personal account to cover these charges. The bank gave me one overdraft back, but will not refund the other two. Do I have any recourse in this? I feel I've been treated extremely poorly by every level of customer service I have spoken to, and at this point I feel they are stealing my money from me.
  #2  
Old 04-19-2005, 11:42 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 3,591
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainOriginal
What is the name of your state?What is the name of your state? CA

I have two checking accounts and one savings account at my bank. One checking account I share with my wife and the other one is my personal account. In March 2005 I requested a new debit card for my joint account because I misplaced my card at home. The bank sent me two cards, both with my name only on them. The papers that the cards came with gave no indication to what accounts the cards were linked to. I called the bank and they explained that one card was for my personal account and one card was for my joint account. Since I did not want to have extra active cards around, I tore up my old personal card. Also, I marked on the back of each card a P or a J, for personal and joint, so I would know which card is which.

Last week we overdrafted on the joint account. When going over the recent charges, I saw that the bank was charging to the joint account purchases I was making with what I thought was my personal account. Looking at the confirmation numbers that the bank was giving me, I noted that the numbers indeed matched the card number of the personal card, so I was not using the wrong card. I called the bank to explain that they charged the wrong account, however, they refuse to acknowledge any error on their behalf. Evidently, when sending the replacement cards, they linked one card to my joint account, and the other card to my personal account and my joint account. They also linked the VISA charge feature to my joint account for that card. When I called them when I originally received the two cards, the bank gave no mention to the personal card being linked to the joint account, and definately did not mention the VISA was linked to the other account. There are three overdrafts that were charged to my joint account for charges that should have been posted to my personal account. There were sufficient funds in my personal account to cover these charges. The bank gave me one overdraft back, but will not refund the other two. Do I have any recourse in this? I feel I've been treated extremely poorly by every level of customer service I have spoken to, and at this point I feel they are stealing my money from me.
Your scenario is unfortunate, but not a legal issue. The only thing I can suggest is going higher up the management chain. Start with a branch manager, then go to the District manager, Regional Manager etc. Hopefully, someone along the way will agree that they treated you badly.

You will probably have more success if you go in person, and try to keep a cool head. If you go in angry and yelling, they will be resistant to helping.

Good luck!
__________________
I've no time for broads who want to rule the world alone. Without men, who'd do up the zipper on the back of your dress? - Bette Davis
  #3  
Old 04-19-2005, 12:45 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,544
I agree. If the situation is truly as you say... and you have some kind of proof of the accounts and cards, I really can't imagine your bank refusing to correct their mistake. However, if the bank didn't make the mistake and you may have simply marked the cards in error, etc., then the bank would not have to reverse any charges or fees.
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:47 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.