![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| | |||||||||||||
| |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Class action filed against JBCWhat is the name of your state? We get quite a few post about JBC so, I though this would be of interest. Also, a NC lawyer has filed a class action on behalf of NC residents. White v JBC Legal Group, P.C. Amount At Issue: $750,000 Category: Credit / Debt Date Added to Site: 4/27/2004 Stage: Filing CASE OVERVIEW National Class Action Targets JBC Legal Group's Collection Practices A national class action has been filed in New York against collection specialists, JBC Legal Group, P.C. The action is brought on behalf of all U.S. residents who received alleged misleading and coercive "form" type collection letters from JBC. The action is brought under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and seeks statutory damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. According to consumers, JBC has utilized unfair, deceptive and misleading tactics to collect debts for third parties. Particularly, consumers claim that JBC did not include in its initial collection letter, or within five days of such letter, the validity notice required by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Under the Act, those attempting to collect a debt for a third party must inform those from whom they are attempting to collect of their right to dispute the validity of the alleged debt within 30 days of initial communication. Generally, this notice is provided as part of the initial communication. However, it must be provided no later than five days after such communication. Additionally, the consumers claim that JBC engaged in threatening, misleading and coercive behavior. According to consumers, the letters threatened legal action if payment was not made immediately. The consumers further claim that the letters claimed such action would be taken without prior notice to consumers. Finally, the consumers allege that JBC represented in its letters that it was a law office, when in fact it is not. Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, it is required that an attorney actually review a debtor's file personally before representing to such debtor that a licensed attorney is involved with the collection. Under the Act, any false, misleading, coercive or unfair practices are specifically forbidden. The consumers claim that JBC’s actions in failing to inform consumers about their right to dispute the debt in question, threatening immediate and unjustified litigation and in making false representations about the involvement of attorneys in the collection action clearly satisfy this standard, entitling them to damages. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
What is the name of your State - North CarolinaWish I had found this site about 20 minutes ago.... JBC Legal Group, P.C. sent a very legal looking letter to me demanding payment for a bill from 5 years ago in the state of Virginia I did not even know I had. I called to pay...was asked how my call could be directed...stated I wanted to pay an apparent bill and "Diane Mills" said, "I can help you." When I asked was she the lawyer or just an answering service, she became indignant and stated she was a "litgation agent". HA I say...my foot. Background noise told me what she really was...a person among millions sitting in a very large room somewhere in La La Land. When I asked to get a copy of what I had paid and to whom, she became indignant again and finally said, "yea". I love telling nasty people to have a nice day. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
I'm tangling with JBC again myself...JBC Legal Group (fka JBC & Associates) tried to mess with me over a year ago, to collect a debt that was: A) Fraudulent - the result of stolen checks being forged B) Time Barred The "debt" was incurred in NJ/PA in 1997/98. I live in California. I received my first actual piece of paper from them today, extending a gracious "limited time 50% settlement offer" which I find hilarious for some reason. Anyway, How do I get in on that class action? |
![]() |