Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > BANKRUPTCY AND CONSUMER CREDIT > Banking & Credit Cards

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-21-2005, 07:04 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2

Colorado sol. 3 years or 6?


What is the name of your state?Colorado
Searching the web and even in this forum I find conflicting dates. Question: Department store credit cards. In Colorado is the sol 3 years or 6?
  #2  
Old 04-21-2005, 10:26 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 15

3 or 6 years


I have just been investigating this myself - my lawyer friend did some research for me and all evidence points to 6 years. I guess there have been some rather recent changes in the laws so the online info that you'll find saying 3 years is no longer accurate.

I was pretty bummed to find that out.

  #3  
Old 04-22-2005, 01:03 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,336
Here what I was able to find

Colorado Statutes of Limitation

Domestic and foreign judgments: 6 years and renewable each six years. Note: If for child support, maintenance or arrears the judgment (lien) stays in effect for the life the judgment without the necessity of renewal every six years.

All contract actions, including personal contracts and actions under the UCC: 3 years (C.R.S. 13-80-101), except as otherwise provided in 13-80-103.5; All claims under the Uniform Consumer Credit Code, except sections 5-5-201(5); All actions to recover, detain or convert goods or chattels, except as otherwise provided in section 13 -80-103.5.

Liquidated debt and unliquidated determinable amount of money due; Enforcement of instrument securing the payment of or evidencing any debt; Action to recover the possession of secured personal property; Arrears of rent: 6 years, (C.R.S. 13-80-103.5)


Looks to me like the SOL is 6 years -- (Enforcement of instrument securing the payment of or evidencing any debt)
  #4  
Old 04-22-2005, 08:05 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nashville,TN
Posts: 15,706
Credit cards are NOT written contracts, they are open-ended agreements. SOL is 3 years:

Quote:
§13-80-101 -
General limitation of actions
Three Years.
(1) The following civil actions, regardless of the theory upon which suit is brought, or against whom suit is brought, shall be commenced within three years after the cause of action accrues, and not thereafter:
(a) All contract actions, including personal contracts and actions under the "Uniform Commercial Code", except as otherwise provided in section §13-80-103.5;
__________________
"Knowledge is Power - use it as you see fit !

I am not a lawyer or a member of the legal profession. My advice is based on research and experience, my own and others, some who practice law. You decide for yourself what actions you do or do not take from my advice.
  #5  
Old 04-23-2005, 07:19 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,066
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ladynred
Credit cards are NOT written contracts, they are open-ended agreements. SOL is 3 years:
Unfortunately, as others have posted in these forums, many judges are considering credit cards as written contracts, not open ended agreements.
__________________
If you feel my answer is rude, mean, snarky or in anyway not to your liking, I did my job. You don't need to tell me.

No private messages, I do not reply to them.
  #6  
Old 04-23-2005, 08:35 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nashville,TN
Posts: 15,706
While that is true, and I've posted just that myself for OK and FL, that doesn't mean you cannot TRY. Use the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and go from there. Judges HAVE been 'educated' by pro se defendants more than once !
__________________
"Knowledge is Power - use it as you see fit !

I am not a lawyer or a member of the legal profession. My advice is based on research and experience, my own and others, some who practice law. You decide for yourself what actions you do or do not take from my advice.
  #7  
Old 04-23-2005, 08:58 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by racer72
Unfortunately, as others have posted in these forums, many judges are considering credit cards as written contracts, not open ended agreements.
Yep, and the problem is..... and follow the details.
The agreement itself IS a written contract; however, the DEBT that arises from the contract is an 'open account', as defined by FEDERAL laws (Truth In Lending). Lots of courts get 'edumicated' on this daily.

TITLE 15 > CHAPTER 41 > SUBCHAPTER I > Part A > § 1602
§ 1602. Definitions and rules of construction
(i) The term “open end credit plan” means a plan under which the creditor reasonably contemplates repeated transactions, which prescribes the terms of such transactions, and which provides for a finance charge which may be computed from time to time on the outstanding unpaid balance. A credit plan which is an open end credit plan within the meaning of the preceding sentence is an open end credit plan even if credit information is verified from time to time.

Source: [url]http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode15/usc_sec_15_00001602----000-.html[/url]
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
  #8  
Old 04-23-2005, 04:29 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Buckeye State
Posts: 697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ladynred
While that is true, and I've posted just that myself for OK and FL, that doesn't mean you cannot TRY. Use the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and go from there. Judges HAVE been 'educated' by pro se defendants more than once !
Please...When will you ever take a gander at the real world? It's ridiculous. 99.99% of pro se defendants couldn't even educate Judge REINHOLD.
  #9  
Old 04-23-2005, 07:01 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2
Thanks for all the responses. Looks like I'll have to do some more reasearch and go frome there.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:14 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.