Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > BANKRUPTCY AND CONSUMER CREDIT > Banking & Credit Cards

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-15-2003, 06:34 PM
ikya
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

National Check Control out of business


I saw this posted on another board, just passing it along.

Judge freezes assets of ex-inmate's collection agency
By Jeffrey Gold, Associated Press, 5/15/2003 17:21
NEWARK, N.J. (AP) A federal judge on Thursday froze the assets of a collection agency that regulators consider one of the nation's most abusive.

By improperly threatening consumers with arrest, criminal prosecution and civil action, Check Investors Inc. of Secaucus collected at least $10.2 million from about 42,100 people since 1995, the Federal Trade Commission charged.

Many did not even owe any money, the agency said.

''The abusive, harassing, illegal conduct is going to stop,'' said Gregory A. Ashe, a senior lawyer in the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection.

Also Thursday, New Jersey and West Virginia sued the company, which does business as National Check Control, accusing it of charging unlawful fees and check fraud.

The company's president, Barry S. Sussman, served 3½ years in federal prison in the late 1980s for mail fraud, bank fraud and impersonating a federal official. He is now in his early 40s.

While in prison, he wrote a how-to guide to credit card fraud, ''I Scam ... You Scam: Specific Methods for Defeating Bureaucratic Organizations.''

Neither Sussman nor lawyer Stephen R. LaCheen immediately returned messages seeking comment.

Besides Sussman and Check Investors, the FTC complaint names his wife, Elisabeth M. Sussman, the company's vice president, and company lawyer Charles T. Hutchins, who is accused of signing dunning letters whose language violated the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act.

In addition to freezing assets, Chief U.S. District Judge John W. Bissell issued a restraining order barring the defendants from violating the debt collections act and barring them from suing any consumer.

Ashe noted that although consumers were also threatened with lawsuits, none were filed.

Bissell scheduled a June 9 hearing on whether to grant a preliminary injunction against the defendants.

Check Investors bought checks that had been returned to check guarantee companies for insufficient funds, typically paying pennies on the dollar, according to FTC court papers.

Check guarantee companies contract with merchants, agreeing to any bad checks that the merchant had first run through their system to ensure it was a valid account.

Check Investors demanded immediate payment from consumers, plus and additional fee of $125 to $130, although most states only allow about $30 in fees, Ashe said.

The collection letters, however, only mentioned the ''amount due,'' without noting the value of the check or the fee, the FTC said.

The company threatened arrest and prosecution in letters and phone calls to consumers and their family members, usually for six months, the FTC said.

''Numerous consumers report that defendants' collectors verbally assaulted them, lacing their demands for immediate payment with invective, insults, profanity, and threats,'' FTC court papers said. One person reported getting 17 calls within 10 minutes.

The collection letters routinely lied that nonpayment would result in garnishment of property or wages, the agency said.
  #2  
Old 05-15-2003, 06:46 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nashville,TN
Posts: 15,706
WAHOOOOOOO !!! See.. complaints in all the right places DO WORK !! Hopefully the states and the Feds will go far enough to keep these slime out of business for good !!!!
__________________
"Knowledge is Power - use it as you see fit !

I am not a lawyer or a member of the legal profession. My advice is based on research and experience, my own and others, some who practice law. You decide for yourself what actions you do or do not take from my advice.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.