Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > BANKRUPTCY AND CONSUMER CREDIT > Banking & Credit Cards

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-12-2007, 02:03 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3

stop payment on overdue checks


What is the name of your state? WA

I deposited a payroll check last that was dated mid september and had a void after 120 days typed on the check. The company that issued the check ordered a stop payment on this check (i didn't know this) and as a result, I drew on that check about 10 times and was fined about $400 in overdraft fees when the check didn't clear.

My question is, were they legally allowed to stop payment on the check (it is not yet a stale check, less than 6 months) for money that should have been payed (it was a payroll check), and can they be liable for any of the overdraft fees that resulted from their stop payment?
  #2  
Old 03-12-2007, 02:10 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by demoniclizard View Post
What is the name of your state? WA

I deposited a payroll check last that was dated mid september and had a void after 120 days typed on the check. The company that issued the check ordered a stop payment on this check (i didn't know this) and as a result, I drew on that check about 10 times and was fined about $400 in overdraft fees when the check didn't clear.

My question is, were they legally allowed to stop payment on the check (it is not yet a stale check, less than 6 months) for money that should have been payed (it was a payroll check), and can they be liable for any of the overdraft fees that resulted from their stop payment?
Have you asked them WHY they stopped payment on the check? They may have a valid reason for doing so.
__________________
Whatever women do they must do twice as well as men to be thought half as good. Luckily, this is not difficult.

Carpe Ominous
  #3  
Old 03-12-2007, 02:30 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3
I am assuming the reason is that the check was overdue (past the 120 days that the check was said to void after).

IF that was their reason, is it a valid reason or are they liable?
  #4  
Old 03-12-2007, 02:42 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by demoniclizard View Post
I am assuming the reason is that the check was overdue (past the 120 days that the check was said to void after).

IF that was their reason, is it a valid reason or are they liable?
Since you waited to deposit the check until AFTER 120 days had past, the employer is not liable. As a matter of fat, they may not have even been the one to stop payment on the check. Their bank should not have accepted a check that was no longer valid. YOUR bank shouldn't have accepted it either. You can try to get the bank to reduce or eliminate the fees due to the fact that they should have never accepted the deposit in the first place.
__________________
Whatever women do they must do twice as well as men to be thought half as good. Luckily, this is not difficult.

Carpe Ominous
  #5  
Old 03-14-2007, 09:40 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3
So I got the check back in the mail and the check was returned because of "stale date." Now im looking a book here with the UCC laws and according to this checks aren't considered "stale" until after 6 months. Why would a customer be able to change the laws just by printing a void date on his check? What if I were to write a check to someone and printed void after 12 hours, would that make the bank liable for cashing it after the void period?

I don't see anywhere in the UCC that allows someone to write in their own void date and have it legally enforcable.
  #6  
Old 03-17-2007, 08:52 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 303
Quote:
Originally Posted by demoniclizard View Post
So I got the check back in the mail and the check was returned because of "stale date." Now im looking a book here with the UCC laws and according to this checks aren't considered "stale" until after 6 months. Why would a customer be able to change the laws just by printing a void date on his check? What if I were to write a check to someone and printed void after 12 hours, would that make the bank liable for cashing it after the void period?

I don't see anywhere in the UCC that allows someone to write in their own void date and have it legally enforcable.
If the check was even one day past the 120 days, then it is stale dated. You deposited a check you knew was stale dated, so therefore, the bank has absolutely no responsibility here.

Why did you wait six months to deposit a check??????
  #7  
Old 03-18-2007, 04:37 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 44

Checks


"I don't see anywhere in the UCC that allows someone to write in their own void date and have it legally enforcable."

I believe the writer of the check can write a stale check date whatever he or she pleases.
It is the writer's money until you decide to cash it. A bank customer can stop a check payment at anytime. Same thing that can happen here. Also some payroll departments may have the payroll computer program set up so that it automatically stop payment on the check after a certain amount of time.

Last edited by SimpleMind; 03-18-2007 at 04:45 AM.
  #8  
Old 03-18-2007, 12:50 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 303
Quote:
Originally Posted by SimpleMind View Post
"I don't see anywhere in the UCC that allows someone to write in their own void date and have it legally enforcable."

I believe the writer of the check can write a stale check date whatever he or she pleases.
It is the writer's money until you decide to cash it. A bank customer can stop a check payment at anytime. Same thing that can happen here. Also some payroll departments may have the payroll computer program set up so that it automatically stop payment on the check after a certain amount of time.
Many companies have "don't cash after xxx days" on their checks.

I just don't understand why the OP thinks anyone is responsible for fees when s/he deposited a check that was in fact stale dated....he took a chance on the outcome. S/he is responsible for fees and no one else.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.