Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Business Bankruptcy : Chapter 7, Chapter 11, Assignment for Benefit of Creditors
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > BANKRUPTCY AND CONSUMER CREDIT > Business Bankruptcy

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-04-2009, 11:28 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2

Am I "priority" or "unsecured" in my Chapter 11 Proof of Claim?


California
Last year I worked as a freelance designer for a company that filed chapter 11. I filed a proof of claim with the bankruptcy court citing a "priority" claim as they still owe me around $2,000.00 in unpaid wages. I recently received a "Notice of Debtors' Fifth Omnibus Objection to Claims (Substantive) and Motion to Reduce and/or Reclassify Such Claims" packet in the mail telling me my claim has been reclassified from "priority" to "unsecured." They aren't objecting the amount owed, just the classification. Do I need to object to this change (as it states I must do in writing by a certain date in order to have the objection seen by the court), or will my claim still be considered with out it?
Additionally, I submitted as proof of my employment my initial contract and all signed unpaid invoices. All wages were earned within 180 days of the company filing for bankruptcy as stated on the proof of claim form under #5 Amount of Claim Entitled to Priority under 11 U.S.C. 507(a). I checked the box as stated.
I am concerned that changing my status from "priority" to "unsecured" with lessen the chances I ever get paid the money they still owe me.
Their reason listed for modification is "Claimant improperly filed in the incorrect class." However, I believe wages fall into the "priority" category.
Should I object to the change?
  #2  
Old 03-04-2009, 11:34 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,346
You are confusing your status with that of an employee.

You appear to be ain independent contractor who was a vendor for the business, selling them your services as per your contract. You would then invoice them for your services.

Your claim is for unpaid invoices, NOT unpaid wages. Hence the change to an "unsecured" status.

Putting up with these non-payment hassles is one of the reasons why independent contractors (freelancers) get paid a higher hourly rate than actual employees.
  #3  
Old 03-04-2009, 12:45 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,673
I agree with SRG, an independent contractor does not receive "wages".
__________________
When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it.
--W. T. Pooh (aka A. A. Milne)
  #4  
Old 03-04-2009, 05:02 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2
I understand your suggestion that the claim is for unpaid invoices, not wages, however Section 507(a)(4)(B), authorizes an independent contractor to file a priority claim for ordinary course goods or services, provided that at least 75% of the amount earned by the individual during the preceding 12-months was earned from the debtor. Considering I fit this description, should I petition to change my status?
  #5  
Old 04-04-2009, 01:15 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1

Courts have ruled that some independent contractors are priority


Moe,

I am in a similar situation in Massachuscetts. The company I was working at as independent contractor closed shop and their last payment check bounced. The company has since filed for bankruptcy. I am filing a "Proof of Claim" form. I am trying to figure out if I qualify for a 507(a)(4)(A) priority.

In 2002, a judge in Texas ruled that an airplane mechanic who was an independent contractor could be considered an employee and got the priority under 507(a)(4)(A). The judge ruling considered, among other things, that the contractor did the work at the company site, the company provided tools and supplies, and the contractor was under supervision of a company manager. The company was Kitty Hawk in Texas. Here's a link to the ruling.
[url]http://www.txnb.uscourts.gov/opinions/pdf/2000-42141-2812.pdf[/url]

Does anyone know of other cases where the court ruled that a non-sales independent contractor qualified for the 507a4A priority?
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.