Florida buyer - I signed contract on a house with a stipulation "subject to satisfactory inspection."
The seller stipulated "limit repairs at $500"
I paid an inspector and the inspection shed new light on this house. There were many little things wrong: hole in drywall (12" x 12"), weather stripping, striker plates, 2 sinks not mounted properly, lights not working, one toilet not working, low water pressure in one bathroom, one lateral board on wood siding needed replaced, roof patched improperly, and few other things.
A few things not noted in the report was that the heating and air was 16 yrs old and drainage outside was poor. The house was listed as built in 1994 but was built in 1990. The seller verbally said the roof was 3 months old--why was it patched if so new; and improperly patch, at that?
Based on these findings, I didn't want the house. The repairs needed would have been more than her limit of $500 and I didn't like the age of the A/C nor the red flags on when the house was built and roof patch.
Now she's getting a lawyer and not signing the release from contract form.
Meanwhile, I'm trying to put in a darn good offer on another house but can't until this is cleared up - houses are hard to get here.
Does she have grounds to stand on? Or could there be something else that is locking me in? Can I countersue (of sorts) if she makes me miss this other house? As a first time buyer, this is not a good experience.