![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| | |||||||||||||
| |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Builder backing outCalifornia We signed a standard purchase aggreement which was accepted by builder to buy a condo unit under construction. That was a year ago and now property values have soared, while builders costs have gone up. Contract was contigent on us providing pre-qual letter within 5 days - which we did. Builder now wants to cancel contract saying that pre-qual letter was not sufficient. We have long ago received loan approval in addition to pre-qual We have lawyer ready to file lis pendens and sue for specific performance if builder doesn't back down. What determines "sufficency of prequal"? Isn't there a general time limit to raise issues like this? Builder signed - but didn't date his acceptance - does that matter? We have opened escrow a year ago. I feel good about our case, but have to wonder what his strategy may be. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Check your contract and with your State office that registers new condo's. In some states there is a public report and depending on what stage the report is in when the contract is signed, the Seller or Buyer may walk. |
![]() |