Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > REAL ESTATE LAW > Buying & Selling a Home

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-04-2006, 08:05 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7

Buy a house not released by the first buyer


I want to make an offer to a house in California and the listing agent told me that the house was suppose to be sold 11 months ago, but on the last day of the escrow the buyer want to quit. Since the seller wouldn't refund his deposit, the buyer refuse to sign the release from contract form till now. So the seller has the house on the market again. The seller would have a contingency on my contract saying that he will let me know whether I can have the house on exact day of escrow, because he is afraid the previous buyer could come back to him eventhough the seller think it could be very little chance since there have been 11 months passed.

I like the house and really want to buy it, but I don't know what is the risk for me in this complicate situation? What I should do in my contract to protect myself?
  #2  
Old 02-04-2006, 09:01 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 75,781
Quote:
Originally Posted by teachulesson
I want to make an offer to a house in California and the listing agent told me that the house was suppose to be sold 11 months ago, but on the last day of the escrow the buyer want to quit. Since the seller wouldn't refund his deposit, the buyer refuse to sign the release from contract form till now. So the seller has the house on the market again. The seller would have a contingency on my contract saying that he will let me know whether I can have the house on exact day of escrow, because he is afraid the previous buyer could come back to him eventhough the seller think it could be very little chance since there have been 11 months passed.

I like the house and really want to buy it, but I don't know what is the risk for me in this complicate situation? What I should do in my contract to protect myself?

**A: and what did your Realtor tell you should be put in the contract?
  #3  
Old 02-04-2006, 11:32 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by teachulesson
I don't know what is the risk for me in this complicate situation?
If you sign the contract with the stipulations as proposed, your risk is that you could lose the house plus ALL of your costs (inspections, application, etc.) at the last minute... and find yourself with no place to live.

Quote:
What I should do in my contract to protect myself?
Include the requirement that if the seller fails to close as scheduled, he pays you $25,000 as 'liquidated damages' for your loss of value, costs, risk, etc.
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
  #4  
Old 02-05-2006, 12:35 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by HomeGuru
**A: and what did your Realtor tell you should be put in the contract?
My realtor told me to add a restriction to the seller's contingency that the only case he wouldn't let me have the house on the day of escrow is he sold the house to the previouse buyer before my escrow day. Other than the previous buyer, he couldn't sign contract with any other buyer after signing my contract.
  #5  
Old 02-05-2006, 12:45 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by JETX
If you sign the contract with the stipulations as proposed, your risk is that you could lose the house plus ALL of your costs (inspections, application, etc.) at the last minute... and find yourself with no place to live.


Include the requirement that if the seller fails to close as scheduled, he pays you $25,000 as 'liquidated damages' for your loss of value, costs, risk, etc.
Could I loose closing cost? Because in California buyer and seller do 50/50 on the closing cost. If the previous buyer come back sue the seller after I get the house, do I have the risk to loose the house?
  #6  
Old 02-05-2006, 11:25 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by teachulesson
Could I loose closing cost? Because in California buyer and seller do 50/50 on the closing cost. If the previous buyer come back sue the seller after I get the house, do I have the risk to loose the house?
If they 'pull the house' from you PRIOR to closing.... then you clearly would NOT risk losing closing costs.

However, you can (and would) lose the following:
1) Costs of inspection
2) Costs of survey
3) Costs of loan (application, fees, etc.)
4) Loss of your place to live (assuming you are in a lease and give notice of termination).... only to find out you have no place to move to.
5) Loss of value of money.
6) Loss of missing out on other possible more 'beneficial' purchases while waiting for this one to happen.
7) And lots of other less tangible things.

And lets not forget.... you would be an idiot to sign such an agreement without any assurance of your actual purchase.....

And finally, get rid of your agent. He/She is clearly NOT working on your behalf if he/she doesn't tell you all of the above.... and that you should go ahead and sign.
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!

Last edited by JETX; 02-05-2006 at 11:28 AM.
  #7  
Old 02-05-2006, 11:38 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 75,781
I agree with JETX.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.