Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > REAL ESTATE LAW > Buying & Selling a Home

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-03-2009, 07:26 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2

Can we sue the seller/home inspector for damages


What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? California

We puchased a home in Palm Springs this past spring. It was disclosed by the seller that there had been a large leak in the roof several months prior but that it had been completed repaired. In fact he said he had padi almost $4000 to do so. We had a home inspection done as well and the report came back that the inspector had walked on the roof and did not find anything wrong with the materials or the shape of the roof. As this is a second home we are only there part time. When we arrived prior to Christmas we found that the leak was absolutely not repaired and the entire ceiling was caving in and water damage was everywhere. It had rained one day and all this damage had occured.....hence our belief that it most certainly could not have repaired as was stated. Is there any remedy for this??? We have had to spend over $6000 to have the roof looked after properly, not to mention the esthetics on the inside repair. Can we sue the seller???? Can or should we sue the Home Inspector....or both????
Any help would be greatly appreciated
  #2  
Old 02-04-2009, 09:44 AM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 296
Home inspection contracts usually have an "out" for the inspector. Did the seller give you paperwork from a roofer/contractor/handyman showing the $4K repairs?

You must prove the seller knew the roof was defective at the time of sale. That is a tough one. Maybe the adjacent neighbors know something.

What did your roofer find was wrong and what did he say or put in writing?

You can sue anyone you want, just be sure of your facts ( and be prepared to be disappointed. )

Was this an asphalt shingle, tile, metal or shake roof. Or do you have a flat roof with tar/gravel or modified bitumen ?
  #3  
Old 02-04-2009, 12:45 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 75,781
Quote:
Originally Posted by valisere View Post
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? California

We puchased a home in Palm Springs this past spring. It was disclosed by the seller that there had been a large leak in the roof several months prior but that it had been completed repaired. In fact he said he had padi almost $4000 to do so. We had a home inspection done as well and the report came back that the inspector had walked on the roof and did not find anything wrong with the materials or the shape of the roof. As this is a second home we are only there part time. When we arrived prior to Christmas we found that the leak was absolutely not repaired and the entire ceiling was caving in and water damage was everywhere. It had rained one day and all this damage had occured.....hence our belief that it most certainly could not have repaired as was stated. Is there any remedy for this??? We have had to spend over $6000 to have the roof looked after properly, not to mention the esthetics on the inside repair. Can we sue the seller???? Can or should we sue the Home Inspector....or both????
Any help would be greatly appreciated



**A: you can sue both but have the home inspector check the roof out and provide his comments before you do anything. Did you find out who repaired the roof prior to closing? Was it a licensed roofing contractor?
  #4  
Old 03-02-2009, 03:16 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2

Can we sue the seller/home inspector for damages


We have located an invoice (from the roofer) that the seller provided the realtor confimring that he had spent aprox $4,000 on the roof. It doesn't give much detail, primarily that the flat roof had a crack that they sealed and then they painted the entire roof. If th invoice is legitimate, then I would assume the seller would believe that the roof was repaired accordingly.
We have tried to locate the roofing contractor but unfortunately all his numbers are disconnected. Probably out of business. The roofers that came to look at the roof on our behalf have stated in writing along with pictures that the roof had not had anything done to it in the last 5 - 7 years. We had 6 quotes....4 of which provided their findings in writing.
The inspector indicated on his report that after walking on the roof that he did not find anything wrong with the condition.
The inspector of course opens this section of his report with a blanket statement (to cover themselves) that the Buyer should querie the seller as to the condition of the roof and that if need be have a water test done prior to the close of escrow. From our perspective, we felt we had done due dilligence by having an inspector check the roof...which in our opinion has "ok'd the condition, as well we had the disclosure from the seller that they werfe aware of a roof issue, however they had it repaired. ????? How much further does one go?????
C
  #5  
Old 03-02-2009, 06:18 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 75,781
Quote:
Originally Posted by valisere View Post
We have located an invoice (from the roofer) that the seller provided the realtor confimring that he had spent aprox $4,000 on the roof. It doesn't give much detail, primarily that the flat roof had a crack that they sealed and then they painted the entire roof. If th invoice is legitimate, then I would assume the seller would believe that the roof was repaired accordingly.
We have tried to locate the roofing contractor but unfortunately all his numbers are disconnected. Probably out of business. The roofers that came to look at the roof on our behalf have stated in writing along with pictures that the roof had not had anything done to it in the last 5 - 7 years. We had 6 quotes....4 of which provided their findings in writing.
The inspector indicated on his report that after walking on the roof that he did not find anything wrong with the condition.
The inspector of course opens this section of his report with a blanket statement (to cover themselves) that the Buyer should querie the seller as to the condition of the roof and that if need be have a water test done prior to the close of escrow. From our perspective, we felt we had done due dilligence by having an inspector check the roof...which in our opinion has "ok'd the condition, as well we had the disclosure from the seller that they werfe aware of a roof issue, however they had it repaired. ????? How much further does one go?????
C


**A: the disclaimer by the inspector is a bunch of BS that does not relieve the inspector from inspecting the roof per national home inspection standards.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.