Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > REAL ESTATE LAW > Buying & Selling a Home

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-21-2001, 10:45 AM
nicolelins
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Angry

Cancellation of Closing


I live in Tennessee. The closing day set for the sale of our home, and purchase of the new home was set for Wed. The family purchasing our home, also had someone purchasing their home, and that family had a family purchasing their home. All the closings were contingent on the sale of the homes. All the closings were to take place within the same time frame. On the first sale, the individuals involved decided on the day of their closing, they did not like results of the appraisal. (They had hoped for 10K over purchase price and only appraised for 3,500 over). So they decided not to go through with it. Now this started the domino effect. Three days before all the remaining closing were to take place all parties are trying to figure out what happens next. Moving companies have been contracted, homes packed up.

My question is, legally, what can be done. It would seem as though once we are this close to closing, this could not happen. These people had bank approval, that was not the issue. It is incomprehensible to me that this could occur so close to our closing. Is the loss of their earnest money the only penalty this family will incur?
  #2  
Old 10-21-2001, 11:48 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,558
If your sale was contingent on the buyer selling his house and his sale fell through, he can exercise his contract right to void the sale. And, if he does this, it is very likely that they (your buyers) would get their earnest money back (what does YOUR contract say in the event of the contingency???).

Ultimately, the first person in the 'chain' is the only person who might have legal recourse against the person who breached HIS agreement (unless of course that included some contingency).
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
  #3  
Old 10-26-2001, 05:50 PM
nicolelins
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you for your reply. It is just very troubling to all of us who has assumed we would be in our new homes, and had planned accordingly. Money was spent on movers, packing, etc. etc. And all this person lost was earnest money.
  #4  
Old 10-26-2001, 11:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,558
You could certainly talk with an attorney to see if you have any rights against the person who backed out, but it is extremely unlikely that you would (due to the contingency clause and the fact that the 'breacher' had no direct contractual relationship to you).
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
  #5  
Old 10-29-2001, 10:58 AM
Lexusl400
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

house


I would like to comment on the situation. The people buying the home who backed out due to the appraisal at closing is wrong. The appraisals are done way in advanced prior to closing giving the buyer adequate time...the appraisal issues should of been noted in the offer...such as; offer subject to appraisal at the satisfaction of buyer. If appraisal came in lower than sale price than you renogotiate price or the buyer has the right to withdrawl...but only if noted in Purchase Agreement. They had plenty of notice to withdraw at that point. I would say they could be made to perform on that contract. I would contact an attorney in your state. I would definitely keep the earnest deposit.

Read over your purchase agreement and see if there was a time fram on buyer contingencies about the appraisal/financing issues.

Good luck!!
  #6  
Old 10-29-2001, 12:48 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,558
Lexus:
In a direct buyer-seller contract you would be correct. However, you seem to have missed the fact that this seller (the author) had NO direct contract with the party that breached THEIR contract. In fact, the breach occurred several levels away from the author.

Secondly, our author's contract DID have a 'buyer contingency' that protected them in this direct contract. This contingency clause would mean that your advice ("keep the earnest deposit") would not stand.
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.