Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > REAL ESTATE LAW > Buying & Selling a Home

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-04-2009, 07:38 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 5

Hubby sold


What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? NEW YORK
Husband and I bought house in 1996 as tenants in th entirety. Became estranged in 1999. (No legal seperation or divorce). Did Husband have right to sell 50% of house without my consent?(I still live here and pay mortgage)
Do I have grounds for lawsuit against him and other parties involved?
  #2  
Old 06-04-2009, 08:23 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,231
You have no claim. A joint tenant/tenant by the entirety has the ability to convert his share to tenancy in common. Then he can sell his half to anybody fool enough to buy it.
__________________
I'm not a lawyer, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night.
  #3  
Old 06-04-2009, 08:31 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: I don't know. The guys with the keys won't say. I think it's top secret info.
Posts: 10,165
he cannot sell your share of the house though.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
DRTDEVL Don't worry... It only hurts the *first* time you agree with justalayman.
  #4  
Old 06-04-2009, 08:49 PM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: MI
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by ANNIE1965 View Post
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? NEW YORK
Did Husband have right to sell 50% of house without my consent?(I still live here and pay mortgage)
Annie, does the bank know about this sale?

Seniors, could the sale of his 50% possibly bring a "due on sale" clause into effect on that mortgage?
  #5  
Old 06-05-2009, 10:45 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 31,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by divona2000 View Post
Annie, does the bank know about this sale?

Seniors, could the sale of his 50% possibly bring a "due on sale" clause into effect on that mortgage?
Yep. The title company should have caught this. I would contact a real estate attorney and the title company used in the sale if I were the OP.
__________________
Parents should remember three things: Love your kids more than you hate your ex (or soon to be ex) & when you have children the relationship with the other parent is until death parts you & how you treat your children determines what type of nursing home you end up in.


Nothing stated by me should be taken as giving you legal advice or forming an attorney/client relationship. The devil is in the details after all.

Licensed to practice law in Ohio and a Guardian Ad Litem for children
  #6  
Old 06-05-2009, 11:42 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,985
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingRon View Post
You have no claim. A joint tenant/tenant by the entirety has the ability to convert his share to tenancy in common. Then he can sell his half to anybody fool enough to buy it.
Are you certain about the tenancy by the entirety? My understanding is that one of the characteristics of tenancy by the entirety is that neither party can deal with the property independently. One party is not able to convert to a tenancy in common.

I can't see that an estrangement would change that.
__________________
Arthur Carlson: Well, first thing we do is call an attorney.
Andy Travis: You always say that.
Arthur Carlson: Yeah, but this time it's appropriate.
  #7  
Old 06-06-2009, 12:16 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: I don't know. The guys with the keys won't say. I think it's top secret info.
Posts: 10,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by anteater View Post
Are you certain about the tenancy by the entirety? My understanding is that one of the characteristics of tenancy by the entirety is that neither party can deal with the property independently. One party is not able to convert to a tenancy in common.

I can't see that an estrangement would change that.
By jove, I think he's right!!
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
DRTDEVL Don't worry... It only hurts the *first* time you agree with justalayman.
  #8  
Old 06-06-2009, 07:36 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohiogal View Post
Yep. The title company should have caught this. I would contact a real estate attorney and the title company used in the sale if I were the OP.
I'm sure the title company simply listed the existing mortgage as an exception to coverage and simply disclaimed any responsibility for payment of any claim due to matters related to the existing mortgage.

In this environment, I doubt any bank would bother with a due on sale because one owner changed. An original borrower is still on title and residing there. At the bank where I work in default, we have parties who have divorced or lost a spouse, and add a later spouse, or a grown child, etc to title all the time and we never exercise due on transfer in those scenarios.
__________________
Adoptive parents ARE "real" parents. Sharing genes is not what makes you a "parent"!
  #9  
Old 06-06-2009, 08:30 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,985
Quote:
Originally Posted by justalayman View Post
By jove, I think he's right!!
Well, you know what they say about blind squirrels and acorns...
__________________
Arthur Carlson: Well, first thing we do is call an attorney.
Andy Travis: You always say that.
Arthur Carlson: Yeah, but this time it's appropriate.
  #10  
Old 06-06-2009, 04:16 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: I don't know. The guys with the keys won't say. I think it's top secret info.
Posts: 10,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by anteater View Post
Well, you know what they say about blind squirrels and acorns...
but they don't say the same thing about Einstein and relativity
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
DRTDEVL Don't worry... It only hurts the *first* time you agree with justalayman.
  #11  
Old 06-08-2009, 04:18 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by anteater View Post
Are you certain about the tenancy by the entirety? My understanding is that one of the characteristics of tenancy by the entirety is that neither party can deal with the property independently. One party is not able to convert to a tenancy in common.

I can't see that an estrangement would change that.
I am absolutely sure about teancy by the entirety. Have been told that this was a illegal transaction. Right now lookig at my options
  #12  
Old 06-08-2009, 04:20 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingRon View Post
You have no claim. A joint tenant/tenant by the entirety has the ability to convert his share to tenancy in common. Then he can sell his half to anybody fool enough to buy it.


In New York this in not the case. I am very sure about that. Just looking at what optios I have to deal with this.
  #13  
Old 06-08-2009, 04:22 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by divona2000 View Post
Annie, does the bank know about this sale?

Seniors, could the sale of his 50% possibly bring a "due on sale" clause into effect on that mortgage?

Please explain this to me I do not understand what this means. And I do not think that the bank knows.
  #14  
Old 06-08-2009, 04:25 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by anteater View Post
Are you certain about the tenancy by the entirety? My understanding is that one of the characteristics of tenancy by the entirety is that neither party can deal with the property independently. One party is not able to convert to a tenancy in common.

I can't see that an estrangement would change that.
I am absolutely positive about the tenants by the entirety that's why I'm wondering how he got away with it.
  #15  
Old 06-08-2009, 04:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,985
Quote:
Originally Posted by ANNIE1965 View Post
I am absolutely positive about the tenants by the entirety that's why I'm wondering how he got away with it.
I was replying to FlyingRon's statement about severing the joint tenancy.

As for how he did it... Beats me.
__________________
Arthur Carlson: Well, first thing we do is call an attorney.
Andy Travis: You always say that.
Arthur Carlson: Yeah, but this time it's appropriate.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.