Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > REAL ESTATE LAW > Buying & Selling a Home

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-30-2006, 09:31 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1
Question

Mortgage Lender Disclosed info to sellers agent


Maryland: We are in the process of buying a new home. When we sent an offer to the seller, the seller's real estate agent called the mortgage company to see if we were qualified for a loan at that amount. (although we had sent a prequal letter) That part I understand, what I have a problem with is that she asked if we were qualified for 380K, which was over the 372 offer we had made, and then continued to ask the lender if we were qualified for more and the lender told them definitely yes. The realtor then called and got a copy of our finance statement, returning to the sellers saying she felt we could afford much more than our offer, so they should counter with something much higher. At that point, we had lost all negotiative power. It is my understanding that the lender should not have indicated whether or not our allowance was higher than what we had offered and that the realtor was out of line by requesting our financials as we were prequalified by a major financial institution. We feel that our right to negotiate was nullified by the actions of the lender and the other real estate agent. Any thoughts?
  #2  
Old 11-30-2006, 09:58 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pittsburgh (North Hills)
Posts: 1,572
First of all , none of this should have happened.

I would file a complaint with the lender and the local Board of Realtors. Both the lender and the Realtor are at fault. I would definitely get a new lender.

Personally, I would withdraw the offer but, if you still want the house, tell them that because of the listing Realtor's misconduct, you will not negotiate higher than the 372K.
__________________
If you're lucky enough to be Irish, you're lucky enough!
  #3  
Old 11-30-2006, 11:20 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,673
A "financial institution" which turns over "personal financial information" to a "third party" without a written release is in violation of federal law. I put quotes on the above as each has a specific meaning under the law and more information would be needed to determine if there were a violation. I'm not sure, but I believe there is a private right of action with a statutoy damage amount per violation. I think you might find something using the first three quotes as a search string or Graham-Leach-Bliley.
__________________
When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it.
--W. T. Pooh (aka A. A. Milne)
  #4  
Old 11-30-2006, 11:45 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 75,781
I agree as various provisions of the Privacy law has been violated by the lender.
And the Realtor violated provisions of the Realtor Code of Ethics and Standards.
  #5  
Old 12-01-2006, 10:08 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sunny Fl
Posts: 1,162
This should have never hapened, but you did NOT loose your negotiative power. Your price is your price. You could be able to finance a million bucks, but if the house is only worth ten thousand, then no deal exists. What is happening to you is wrong, but your choices are to either stick to your guns or go find another house.
  #6  
Old 12-04-2006, 10:39 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by deebee7 View Post
Maryland: We are in the process of buying a new home. When we sent an offer to the seller, the seller's real estate agent called the mortgage company to see if we were qualified for a loan at that amount. (although we had sent a prequal letter) That part I understand, what I have a problem with is that she asked if we were qualified for 380K, which was over the 372 offer we had made, and then continued to ask the lender if we were qualified for more and the lender told them definitely yes. The realtor then called and got a copy of our finance statement, returning to the sellers saying she felt we could afford much more than our offer, so they should counter with something much higher. At that point, we had lost all negotiative power. It is my understanding that the lender should not have indicated whether or not our allowance was higher than what we had offered and that the realtor was out of line by requesting our financials as we were prequalified by a major financial institution. We feel that our right to negotiate was nullified by the actions of the lender and the other real estate agent. Any thoughts?
I have been in your shoes. If the spoke to the mortgage BROKER, then that is ok. About the sharing private financial sheets, that might be a no no.

BUT, if they spoke with your LENDER, not the BROKER, then that is a violation in itself. That is what happened to me. The person is did it ended up losing his company and bankrupt.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.