Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > REAL ESTATE LAW > Buying & Selling a Home

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-18-2001, 03:02 PM
cdeitchman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Colorado
Hello. Is it not true that when you purchase a property through a property tax sale anywhere in the US that you are actually only purchasing an equity interest in the property which amounts to nothing more than color of title and not a full and clear title? Is it also true that in order to obtain full and clear title, you must go back to the owner of the property at the time of the tax sale or his heirs/assigns and negotiate the purchase of the title?

Thank you.

C Deitchman
  #2  
Old 07-18-2001, 03:34 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 75,781
Not true on both counts.
  #3  
Old 07-18-2001, 09:21 PM
cdeitchman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Respectful reply


There are precedents set regarding color of title and what it does to the rights of property ownership.

Take the case of U.S. vs Beggerly. June 8, 1998.
Cite record 97-731. They lost, won, lost and appealed and the case wound up in the supreme court where it was finally settled with a written decision from Chief Justice Rehnquist for the following 2 reasons:

They signed a consent agreement in which the statute of limitation had expired.

They did not hold a clear chain of title due to the fact they had purchased the property at a property tax sale. What they had was "color of title".

When you buy a property at a tax sale, you are not buying the property itself, you are buying the tax lien.

I invite comments...thank you.


  #4  
Old 07-18-2001, 10:42 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 75,781
I am familar with this case and it does not apply in all situations.
  #5  
Old 07-18-2001, 11:35 PM
cdeitchman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Please be more specific..you leave way too much open to ponder. Cite cases or specifics. Otherwise your opinion floats like water and does not apply to the real world.

Thank you.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.