Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > REAL ESTATE LAW > Buying & Selling a Home

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-13-2001, 03:51 PM
amoffajr
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I recently purchased a home in Massachusetts, Worcester County (5/31). When I put a bid on the home and signed the agreement of sale (late Feb.), the outside property was under several feet of snow. It wasn't until late spring that I noticed a large pond in the back yard. I was assured by my realitor that it was a drainage problem that the township and the builder were fixing. After settlement however, my new neighbors informed me that roughly 30% of my yard was protected wetlands - land that I'm not permitted to do anything with. These wetlands do not show up on the property plot that I got from the town records deptartment nor on any township documentation disclosing protected wetland sites. Shouldn't the owner and their agent have disclosed this?
  #2  
Old 06-13-2001, 09:18 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 75,781
Yes and where is the survey that you should have ordered?
  #3  
Old 06-13-2001, 11:15 PM
amoffajr
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
A home inspection and title insurance were ordered and a certified plot plan was acquired from the county. The plot plan shows a 10 foot utility easment along the front of the property but no other easments. Furthermore, the property was under 2 feet of snow during the period that the site survey would have normally been performed.
  #4  
Old 06-14-2001, 09:57 AM
amoffajr
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
An additional comment - the house is only one year old as of this month. The site survey from the county was done in December of 1999. Would a survey even catch it if a) the wetlands are not identified by any physical signs, fences, etc. and b) township documentation shows not wetlands in the area?
  #5  
Old 06-14-2001, 10:46 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 75,781
Yes, because the property legal description, etc. should be on the title report which the surveyor would use.
What abut zoning/building dept. records?
The Seller and agent should have disclosed the wetlands fact.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.