Should seller fix roof before I buy?

My wife and I have entered a contract to purchase a house in Florida. The inspector said that the roof was installed incorrectly and recommended getting a roof inspector to look at it. The roof inspector agreed that the shingles are not installed correctly according to guidelines for asphalt roofing, and estimated a repair cost of about $1500. (Specifically, the valleys are woven the wrong way, which could divert water incorrectly.)

According to the owner (who has lived there for 3 years,) the roof was redone 1+1/2 years ago at a cost of approximately $3500. The new roof was done on top of the existing roof.

Both inspectors have said that there is a potential for leaking due to the incorrect installation, but there is currently no evidence of water damage. Obviously, the current owner feels that if there's no known damage then he shouldn't have to pay for repair. Also, the company who did the roof has subsequently left the area.

1) Can I require the seller to repair the roof as a "non-functioning" item?

2) If not, what options do I have if I buy the house and need to cash in on a warranty?

[LegalBeagle]

Look at it this way, two independant 'experts' are telling you there is a problem with the roof. The seller (who is not an expert and wants your money) is saying all is ok?

Personally, I would tell him to fix it or the deal is off!

[HomeGuru]

Originally posted by LouieOkey
My wife and I have entered a contract to purchase a house in Florida. The inspector said that the roof was installed incorrectly and recommended getting a roof inspector to look at it. The roof inspector agreed that the shingles are not installed correctly according to guidelines for asphalt roofing, and estimated a repair cost of about $1500. (Specifically, the valleys are woven the wrong way, which could divert water incorrectly.)

According to the owner (who has lived there for 3 years,) the roof was redone 1+1/2 years ago at a cost of approximately $3500. The new roof was done on top of the existing roof.

Both inspectors have said that there is a potential for leaking due to the incorrect installation, but there is currently no evidence of water damage. Obviously, the current owner feels that if there's no known damage then he shouldn't have to pay for repair. Also, the company who did the roof has subsequently left the area.

1) Can I require the seller to repair the roof as a "non-functioning" item?
**My response: yes, but the reason should be based on defective installation and non-compliance with manufacturers installation specifications and roofing industry standards.
********************

2) If not, what options do I have if I buy the house and need to cash in on a warranty?

There is no warranty period so you would be taking cash out of your own pocket. Get the picture from the HomeGuru and Legal Beagle?