Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > REAL ESTATE LAW > Buying & Selling a Home

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 



Sign up for our Free Email Newsletter
For Email Marketing you can trust
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 05-22-2009, 01:28 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,007
Is it? Was the option exercised?
__________________
When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it.
--W. T. Pooh (aka A. A. Milne)
  #17  
Old 05-22-2009, 11:34 PM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 36
Yes, the option was exercised. Md defines an option contract as: "a continuing offer to sell during the duration thereof which on being exercised by the optionee becomes a binding and enforceable contract." See Straley v. Osborne, 262 Md. 514, 278 A.2d 64.

It appears that the sellers acceptance was "unequivocal and in accordance with the terms of the option". It also appears that the sellers acted in bad faith by failing to meet with OP and deliberately avoided and/or evaded him to frustrate OP's right to exercise option.

The SOF defense would fail here, as the contract was an option contract and not a contract for the sale of land. I think OP can bring an action against sellers for specific performance.
  #18  
Old 05-26-2009, 02:53 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,007
I have to disagree with you here on both counts. We have no idea if the option was exercised. It would be very fact sensitive and would require reading the option contract. I suspect the OP could have a case of a breach of good faith and fair dealing regarding the option with the builder (and has been at least part of my position all along) but, we are a long way from asserting it.

In addition, an option contract on land would almost assuredly fall under the statute of frauds absent some odd quirk in the state's law. SOF is on contracts which of and concerns land, not just the sale of land. Wouldn't you say an option contract for the purchase of land, "of and concerns" land?

I am uncertain what you are trying to assert with the case cite. No one has said an option contract doesn't obligate the parties. Finally, specific performance would not be a good remedy and I think the court unlikely to grant it as the current owner was a bonafide purchaser for value.
__________________
When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it.
--W. T. Pooh (aka A. A. Milne)
  #19  
Old 05-29-2009, 04:31 PM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 36
I agree, but isn't that true of every opinion posted on this forum, that unless one has "all" the facts, we only have a general idea.

I cited that case because the OP had stated "I see in the document states 'seller can cancel this reservation at any time by refunding deposit'." And, did not think that condition would hold up. I was able to confirm it reading the case.

Also, no doubt the SOF would be raised. But my opinion is that it would fail because the OP had fully performed on the option contract.
  #20  
Old 05-29-2009, 05:19 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,007
You wrote the option was exercised. Please state the facts indicating that.

The seller refund issue makes me believe it may not actually be an option and may indicate the OP gets the money back as it was only a deposit.

Again, please indicate how the OP fully performed on the option contract.
__________________
When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it.
--W. T. Pooh (aka A. A. Milne)
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:33 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.