![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| | |||||||||||||
| |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Where's the Earnest Money Deposit!?What is the name of your state? MD Private party transaction in MD. On December 4, buyer faxed to seller a signed copy of contract & copy of earnest money check made out to a title company. Signed copy sent back Dec 8. Seller discovered that no earnest money was given to title company, and terminated on Jan 15. Buyer finally deposited earnest money on Jan 23. Contract was silent re: when E$ was to be deposited with title company, but does specifically cite earnest money to a title company. Did buyer have 7 days to give $$ to title company? Is there a specific MD law regarding when earnest money must be deposited? Is it safe to say that 6+ weeks was not w/in a reasonable amount of time? |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
Last edited by HomeGuru; 02-09-2005 at 08:07 AM. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Did the seller do anything (like accept the dough) after the late payment? |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
**A: good question and another one would be "writer, are you the Seller or the Buyer?" |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
The buyer is raising a stink...claiming the k is still enforceable. He's even threatened suit. If he does file suit, what are my chances of recovering fees? It seems that buyer would be foreced to take an extremely outrageous position -- claiming an enforeceable k despite the 6+ weeks it took him to deposit the $$. Thanks for the replies -- I appreciate both of your input. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| What are YOUR damages? What fees? |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
|
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
How did the bad guy cause these fees and costs? They sound like the cost of doing business to me without any further details; thus not compensable. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
**A: those items are not damages. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
/* HOUSE BILL 460 Article - Business Occupations and Professions 17-502. (a) An associate real estate broker or a real estate salesperson who obtains trust money while providing real estate brokerage services promptly shall submit the trust money to the real estate broker on whose behalf the associate real estate broker or the real estate salesperson provided the real estate brokerage services. (b) (1) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (c) of this section, a real estate broker [promptly] PROMPTLY, WITHIN BUT NOT MORE THAN 7 BUSINESS DAYS AFTER THE ACCEPTANCE OF A CONTRACT OF SALE BY BOTH PARTIES, shall deposit trust money in an account that is maintained by the real estate broker: (i) separately from the real estate broker's own accounts; and (ii) solely for trust money. (2) A real estate broker may not use trust money for any purpose other than that for which it is entrusted to the real estate broker. (c) Subsection (b)(1) of this section does not apply if the real estate broker receives written directions to the contrary as authorized under § 17-505(c) of this subtitle. SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect October 1, 2001. */ Obviously, this applies to brokers. However, the time limit should have some bearing, if not dispositive, on a private party's time limit -- in defining what a reasonable amount of time would be. Of course a private party might not be held to the same standard as a broker, but this time limit for depositing trust money isn't necessarily within such a distinction. So, a R amount of time could be 7 days for a private party. Maybe even 10 days? Regarding the award of attorney fees, aside from the sales contact actually specifying the award of attorney fees, costs, etc., there are two other potention sources: statutory & judicial discretion. Since the contract is silent, I was wondering whether either of you knew anything wrt MD's position on awarding such fees & costs. The buyer's claim is outrageously weak, and as such, my thoughts were that it might be so outrageous that a judicial award might be called for, or even a statutory claim being triggered thereby. Yes, these are not compensatory, incidental, or punitive damages. But as noted above, they could be contrued as statutory damages insofar as statutorily provided. Again, was just wondering if either of you had any insignt wrt MD's posture. Thanks. Last edited by ifhn; 02-07-2005 at 10:29 AM. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
|
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
![]() |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
**A: personally, I prefer a good looking female chiropractor with a nice body. |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| You know**************.... |
![]() |