Ohiogal,
First let me apologize.....I cannot get the quote feature to work, nor can I get the copy and paste to work either. This response is to your post numbered #2.
I dont think that I worded myself appropriately, which led to a misunderstanding of my point of view. My fault entirely. The statement that I made about kids in rotten situations with parents with no sense was referring to the many sex abuse cases that are pending in our county. The interviewer gave me several scenerios from previous cases (no names were given) to ask me how I would react and feel. One was of a mother who wanted her and her child to stay in the house with the sexually abusive father while he got therapy for his disorder. I was referring to these situations, and should have made myself more clear.
I realize that there are many sensible good parents that need help, along with their children. I did not intend to imply otherwise.
As for saving children from their families.....that is not something that I can intend to do, quite simply because I will not have the power to "save" anyone. Any and all decisions to be made will be made by the courts, not me.
As for my role as an investigator, I am aware of that. The lady that I spoke with was very clear in what my responsibilities would be and what my limitations would be.
She also made it clear that while the attorneys would be for the parents, my presence will be for the CHILD. I am to be there to make sure that the CHILDS needs are being met and that the CHILD is properly considered in all the proceedings, based on the facts.
I do intend to answer you question list. I'll try to get to them in a few minutes.
Thank you for your reply and your thoughts on this!
First let me apologize.....I cannot get the quote feature to work, nor can I get the copy and paste to work either. This response is to your post numbered #2.
I dont think that I worded myself appropriately, which led to a misunderstanding of my point of view. My fault entirely. The statement that I made about kids in rotten situations with parents with no sense was referring to the many sex abuse cases that are pending in our county. The interviewer gave me several scenerios from previous cases (no names were given) to ask me how I would react and feel. One was of a mother who wanted her and her child to stay in the house with the sexually abusive father while he got therapy for his disorder. I was referring to these situations, and should have made myself more clear.
I realize that there are many sensible good parents that need help, along with their children. I did not intend to imply otherwise.
As for saving children from their families.....that is not something that I can intend to do, quite simply because I will not have the power to "save" anyone. Any and all decisions to be made will be made by the courts, not me.
As for my role as an investigator, I am aware of that. The lady that I spoke with was very clear in what my responsibilities would be and what my limitations would be.
She also made it clear that while the attorneys would be for the parents, my presence will be for the CHILD. I am to be there to make sure that the CHILDS needs are being met and that the CHILD is properly considered in all the proceedings, based on the facts.
I do intend to answer you question list. I'll try to get to them in a few minutes.
Thank you for your reply and your thoughts on this!