nebraskafan
Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Any (again hypothetical)
As custodial parents, we must make the children available to non-custodial parents on the weekends they are to visit with them. Ok..I get that. But if the NCP chooses continuously not to exercise that right, at what point can CP go back to the court and say "Hang on a second - this person is not exercising the right to be a parent - therefore, they don't want the right. They have proven this over x amount of months/years?"
The root question is how long are CPs held hostage to NCPs random visitations? When can the CP speak up and question this?
This is not happening to me, but I've seen it in other threads & I know the answer is to go by the court order. When is it feasible to go back and ask for modification?
As custodial parents, we must make the children available to non-custodial parents on the weekends they are to visit with them. Ok..I get that. But if the NCP chooses continuously not to exercise that right, at what point can CP go back to the court and say "Hang on a second - this person is not exercising the right to be a parent - therefore, they don't want the right. They have proven this over x amount of months/years?"
The root question is how long are CPs held hostage to NCPs random visitations? When can the CP speak up and question this?
This is not happening to me, but I've seen it in other threads & I know the answer is to go by the court order. When is it feasible to go back and ask for modification?