Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > FAMILY LAW > Child Custody & Visitation

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-02-2006, 11:19 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 850

pri**** custodial parent in Texas?


What is the name of your state? TX

I will be filing for divorce from my husband. We have been separated for one year, and have been cooperating with a 50-50 physical custody split with our two children. The arrangement is working well for everyone.

I know in Texas law, one parent is named pri**** custodial parent even when you have a 50-50 physical custody agreement. I intend for my name to be the pri**** custodial parent - but I believe my stbx will choose to fight me on that.

I was a stay-home mom for four full years. The kids are 5 and 7 now. My job for the last two years is as a freelance journalist, so I work from home and alter my hours during my week with the kids so that I can take them to and from school. I have steady income - in fact, I have not asked for A DIME from the stbx and we split their expenses 50-50, even though he makes $30,000 a year MORE than I do.

However, I am the one who 'left' the family home and wants out of the marriage.

Is that grounds for him to try and get his name as pri**** custodial parent?
  #2  
Old 01-02-2006, 11:24 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Odo of Cluny Parish
Posts: 29,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimberlywrites
What is the name of your state? TX

I will be filing for divorce from my husband. We have been separated for one year, and have been cooperating with a 50-50 physical custody split with our two children. The arrangement is working well for everyone.

I know in Texas law, one parent is named pri**** custodial parent even when you have a 50-50 physical custody agreement. I intend for my name to be the pri**** custodial parent - but I believe my stbx will choose to fight me on that.

I was a stay-home mom for four full years. The kids are 5 and 7 now. My job for the last two years is as a freelance journalist, so I work from home and alter my hours during my week with the kids so that I can take them to and from school. I have steady income - in fact, I have not asked for A DIME from the stbx and we split their expenses 50-50, even though he makes $30,000 a year MORE than I do.

However, I am the one who 'left' the family home and wants out of the marriage.

Is that grounds for him to try and get his name as pri**** custodial parent?
Q: Is that grounds for him to try and get his name as pri**** custodial parent?

A: Yes; but I can't tell you if it will work.
__________________
There are two rules for success:

(1) Never tell everything you know.
  #3  
Old 01-02-2006, 01:11 PM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 853
Try this site: [url]http://www.hmoorelaw.com/divorce.htm[/url].

The terminology in TX is "managaing conservator" and "possessory conservator."

Quote:
Traditionally, one parent was named Managing Conservator and one named Possessory Conservator. The Managing Conservator had the right to make these major decisions regarding the children's residency, health care, education, and so forth. However, as of September 1, 1995, the legal presumption in Texas is that the parents should be named Joint Managing Conservators. That means that the rights and powers of a parent are somehow to be divided between the parents or exercised by agreement. When Joint Managing Conservatorship is awarded, the parties or the judge must decide and write into the decree how those rights are to be exercised.
Most likely, you'll be "Joint Managing Conservators," which is probably for the best.
  #4  
Old 01-02-2006, 09:49 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kane
Try this site: [url]http://www.hmoorelaw.com/divorce.htm[/url].

The terminology in TX is "managaing conservator" and "possessory conservator."



Most likely, you'll be "Joint Managing Conservators," which is probably for the best.
True, however one parent is almost always named residential custodian also. This entitles that parent to deside pri**** residence and to collect child support. In Texas, mothers are named pri**** a mojority of the time, when both parents are equally able to care for the children.
__________________
Whatever women do they must do twice as well as men to be thought half as good. Luckily, this is not difficult.

Carpe Ominous
  #5  
Old 01-02-2006, 10:35 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,471
thats why there is a problem with these titles!

if the title only allows you to collect child support and you dont want it, what is the point of fighting over it?

there shouldnt be any "pri**** custodial parent"
  #6  
Old 01-02-2006, 10:40 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 850
But it also gives the parent the right to determine pri**** residence for the children. We live within miles of each other (me and the stbx) but in two different school districts, for example. Their pri**** residence will determine which schools they attend.
  #7  
Old 01-03-2006, 12:39 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by dynomight77
thats why there is a problem with these titles!

if the title only allows you to collect child support and you dont want it, what is the point of fighting over it?

there shouldnt be any "pri**** custodial parent"
If parents get along, there's nothing to fight about. If they can come to an agreement on their own that's great. But that agreement nedds to be spelled out VERY clearly because things can always change.

Say mom & dad agree to split everything 50/50 (clothes, school expenses, sports, insurance, etc.). The kid is on mom's family ins. and 2 years down the road, mom's remarried with a new kid, dad doesn't think he should have to pay for half the insurance anymore because mom would have to pay the same amount whether she's got 1 kid or 10 and she'd have to pay it for the new kid too. Or mom thinks the child should go to private school and dad can't afford it, remember they agreed to split everything 50/50. Should he still have to pay?

They get along now, but no one knows what will happen down the road.
__________________
Whatever women do they must do twice as well as men to be thought half as good. Luckily, this is not difficult.

Carpe Ominous
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.