"babe'kid.......IAAL brings up a point that there are no adultery laws in California. Which very well may be true since I don't keep up with the laws for that state. There also may not be any "emotional distress" or "alienation of affection" laws in California either."
MY RESPONSE:
There are no such laws in California, i.e., adultery, alienation of affection. Really FKNA, you've got to stay out of the Family Law arena on these forums. Why would you bring up Alienation of Affection anyway? Even if it were a viable cause of action, didn't you read our writer's post ? She was NEVER married to the guy ! And, in the States where AofA is the law, there must be a marriage to "alienate" - - first !
And then, you talk about "emotional distress." For what purpose? And, under what theory, or law, are you referencing by making such an outlandish comment?
"Point being, regardless of what the laws are for your state, one sometimes need to use common sense. You had an affair with a married man and had a child with this man. Per your post it appears that he is paying child support, but now 4 1/2 years later you don't feel that he is being fair. Whatever further action you decide on taking may have dire consequences. If you take legal actions, this could piss the ex-lover off and he in turn could contact a lawyer to see what kind of legal recourse he has against you and/or his present wife could do the same."
MY RESPONSE:
And, just what is your "point" ? Oh please, you've got to stop. All you're doing is misleading people. It doesn't matter to the State why the child is in existence - - the fact remains, the child is here. Therefore, under California law, our writer is entitled to have her child support adjusted to State Guidelines once each year. As a child grows, it requires more of everything (much like the alcohol you need more and more of each year).
The State couldn't care less if the "ex-lover" gets "pissed off" and neither should our writer. If the child support is not within guidelines for the age of the child, it will be adjusted. Period.
His wife has no legal standing to "do the same" of anything to our writer, in California. Where are you coming up with this bullcrap ?
You've got to stop trying to justify yourself. In doing so, you are misleading and misguiding our Family Law writers, and causing people to be concerned about things that are of NO CONCERN ! Since you are brainless in the area of Family Law, then your stupid comments cause me to have to follow you around the boards to make corrections to your absolute stupidity. Stay off the Family Law boards so I don't have to waste my time on you and your kind.
You're such an idiot. Go back to drinking at the lake in the middle of the night. You do that quite well.
IAAL