Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Child Support : (Formerly part of Child Custody and Visitation.)
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > FAMILY LAW > Child Support

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-02-2009, 07:38 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 40

arrears and federal policy


What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? NV I have just been reading some posts, and noticed something I should ask about...If, under federal law arrears can be paid at 25% of the original CS order, and the child is over 18, how can SSDI be garnished at 65% of what NCP receives? Would that be something he would need to ask about at a modification hearing, or would that be automatic? He is filing a motion to modify due to his disability and inability to work, but at the moment, his SSDI is being garnished for the full amount that he should have been paying, $525.00. Any advice would be appreciated very much. Thank you.
  #2  
Old 11-02-2009, 08:34 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 41,458
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelly Burr View Post
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? NV I have just been reading some posts, and noticed something I should ask about...If, under federal law arrears can be paid at 25% of the original CS order, and the child is over 18, how can SSDI be garnished at 65% of what NCP receives? Would that be something he would need to ask about at a modification hearing, or would that be automatic? He is filing a motion to modify due to his disability and inability to work, but at the moment, his SSDI is being garnished for the full amount that he should have been paying, $525.00. Any advice would be appreciated very much. Thank you.
Something is off kilter here, because SSDI cannot normally be garnished that high. Even the IRS cannot garnish more than 25% of SSDI. He should definitely be getting a face to face appointment at the local SSA office.
__________________
in vino veritas
  #3  
Old 11-02-2009, 09:26 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The Heart o' Dixie
Posts: 3,254
Quote:
Originally Posted by LdiJ View Post
Something is off kilter here, because SSDI cannot normally be garnished that high. Even the IRS cannot garnish more than 25% of SSDI. He should definitely be getting a face to face appointment at the local SSA office.
I'm sure OP has been given that advice more than once:

[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/child-support-98/ssdi-back-support-484278.html[/url]
[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/social-security-disability-ssi-law-70/ssd-back-child-support-484282.html[/url]
[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/social-security-disability-ssi-law-70/ssdi-ssi-484456.html[/url]
[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/consumer-bankruptcy-2/new-spouse-his-old-debt-484355.html[/url]
[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/child-support-98/supportkids-discharge-debt-484792.html[/url]
[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/social-security-disability-ssi-law-70/employment-ssdi-490985.html[/url]
[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/child-support-98/will-go-forever-476917.html[/url]
[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/child-custody-visitation-37/limitations-arrears-463881.html[/url]
[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/debt-collections-84/farmed-out-child-support-454068.html[/url]
[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/child-support-98/disabled-only-1-car-453441.html[/url]
__________________
Actions have consequences. Remember Newton's Third Law of Motion in everything you do.
  #4  
Old 11-02-2009, 09:36 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Weigh a pie...
Posts: 6,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGeekess View Post
I'm sure OP has been given that advice more than once:

[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/child-support-98/ssdi-back-support-484278.html[/url]
[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/social-security-disability-ssi-law-70/ssd-back-child-support-484282.html[/url]
[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/social-security-disability-ssi-law-70/ssdi-ssi-484456.html[/url]
[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/consumer-bankruptcy-2/new-spouse-his-old-debt-484355.html[/url]
[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/child-support-98/supportkids-discharge-debt-484792.html[/url]
[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/social-security-disability-ssi-law-70/employment-ssdi-490985.html[/url]
[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/child-support-98/will-go-forever-476917.html[/url]
[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/child-custody-visitation-37/limitations-arrears-463881.html[/url]
[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/debt-collections-84/farmed-out-child-support-454068.html[/url]
[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/child-support-98/disabled-only-1-car-453441.html[/url]
Game, set & match....

__________________
*****************************


When you can't bear something but it goes on anyway, the person who survives isn't you anymore; you've changed and become someone else, a new person, the one who did bear it after all.
— Austin Grossman

Quote:
Salagadoola mechicka boola bibbidi-bobbidi-boo
  #5  
Old 11-03-2009, 11:00 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 40

arrears and federal policy


Thanx for your responses....Actually, no one has ever mentioned, that I know of, about the 25% rule. If I had missed it before, I'm sorry. He will be going to the local SSA office today. Thanx again.
  #6  
Old 11-03-2009, 08:51 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 40

Arrears and federal policy


Hubby went to local SSA office and they told him they did not know anything about that federal policy concerning the 25 percent rule. Can anyone tell me where I can print them out to include with his court papers? Thank you
  #7  
Old 11-03-2009, 08:56 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: With Capt'n Hook
Posts: 6,856
Quote:
Federal Law, in the Consumer Credit Protection Act, (CCPA), 15 USC 1673(b)(2) says:

2) The maximum part of the aggregate disposable earnings of an individual for any workweek which is subject to garnishment to enforce any order for the support of any person shall not exceed -

*

(A) where such individual is supporting his spouse or dependent child (other than a spouse or child with respect to whose support such order is used), 50 per centum of such individual's disposable earnings for that week; and
*

(B) where such individual is not supporting such a spouse or dependent child described in clause (A), 60 per centum of such individual's disposable earnings for that week; except that, with respect to the disposable earnings of any individual for any workweek, the 50 per centum specified in clause (A) shall be deemed to be 55 per centum and the 60 per centum specified in clause (B) shall be deemed to be 65 per centum, if and to the extent that such earnings are subject to garnishment to enforce a support order with respect to a period which is prior to the twelve-week period which ends with the beginning of such workweek.
The 25% i believe is for regular consumer debt.

Why hasn't dad modified so that the child's portion would go in lieu of child support? Or are we talking ARREARAGES of a child who has aged out?
__________________
If you don't like something, change it. If you can't change it, change your attitude. Don't complain.

Maya Angelou
  #8  
Old 11-03-2009, 09:08 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 40

Arrears and fed policy


Arrears only and children are in their thirties.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:01 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.